Re: [PATCH RT 1/5] net: Properly annotate the try-lock for the seqlock

2020-11-16 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2020-11-15 05:52:33 [+0100], Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 13:24 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 20:00 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > __raw_write_seqcount_end() is an integral part of write_sequnlock(), > > > but we do seem to be missing a

Re: [PATCH RT 1/5] net: Properly annotate the try-lock for the seqlock

2020-11-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 13:24 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 20:00 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > __raw_write_seqcount_end() is an integral part of write_sequnlock(), > > but we do seem to be missing a seqcount_release() in 5.4-rt. > > > > Yep, you're right, it's just the

Re: [PATCH RT 1/5] net: Properly annotate the try-lock for the seqlock

2020-11-14 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 20:00 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 14:14 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > > This patch seems to fix it for me: > > If there was any discussion about this patch, I missed it. There wasn't, just this thread. > > > From

Re: [PATCH RT 1/5] net: Properly annotate the try-lock for the seqlock

2020-11-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 14:14 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > This patch seems to fix it for me: If there was any discussion about this patch, I missed it. > From 4855377d0cb34b1b67a5c6d84cc8609c9da0bc3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > Message-Id: >

Re: [PATCH RT 1/5] net: Properly annotate the try-lock for the seqlock

2020-11-13 Thread Tom Zanussi
Hi Steve, On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 11:06 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 10:38 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > 5.4.74-rt42-rc2 stable review patch. > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > -- > > > > From: Sebastian Andrzej

Re: [PATCH RT 1/5] net: Properly annotate the try-lock for the seqlock

2020-11-13 Thread Tom Zanussi
Hi Steve, On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 10:38 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > 5.4.74-rt42-rc2 stable review patch. > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > In patch >("net/Qdisc: use a seqlock instead seqcount") > > the

[PATCH RT 1/5] net: Properly annotate the try-lock for the seqlock

2020-11-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
5.4.74-rt42-rc2 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior In patch ("net/Qdisc: use a seqlock instead seqcount") the seqcount has been replaced with a seqlock to allow to reader to boost the preempted writer.