On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 10:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:55:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> > On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 00:57 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Even the bits in tools/perf/ are arch specific, so I guess this goes via
> > > the
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 10:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:55:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> > On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 00:57 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Even the bits in tools/perf/ are arch specific, so I guess this goes via
> > > the
Em Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:55:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 00:57 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Anju T escreveu:
> > > On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
> > > >
Em Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:55:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 00:57 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Anju T escreveu:
> > > On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 00:57 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Anju T escreveu:
> > On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
> > >
> > > arch/powerpc/Kconfig| 1 +
> > > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 00:57 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Anju T escreveu:
> > On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
> > >
> > > arch/powerpc/Kconfig| 1 +
> > > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
Em Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Anju T escreveu:
> On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
> >This short patch series adds the ability to sample the interrupted
> >machine state for each hardware sample.
> >
> >To test this patchset,
> >Eg:
> >
> >$ perf record -I? #
Em Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Anju T escreveu:
> On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
> >This short patch series adds the ability to sample the interrupted
> >machine state for each hardware sample.
> >
> >To test this patchset,
> >Eg:
> >
> >$ perf record -I? #
On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
This short patch series adds the ability to sample the interrupted
machine state for each hardware sample.
To test this patchset,
Eg:
$ perf record -I? # list supported registers
output:
available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8
On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
This short patch series adds the ability to sample the interrupted
machine state for each hardware sample.
To test this patchset,
Eg:
$ perf record -I? # list supported registers
output:
available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8
Hi,
Any updates on this?
On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
This short patch series adds the ability to sample the interrupted
machine state for each hardware sample.
To test this patchset,
Eg:
$ perf record -I? # list supported registers
output:
available
Hi,
Any updates on this?
On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
This short patch series adds the ability to sample the interrupted
machine state for each hardware sample.
To test this patchset,
Eg:
$ perf record -I? # list supported registers
output:
available
This short patch series adds the ability to sample the interrupted
machine state for each hardware sample.
To test this patchset,
Eg:
$ perf record -I? # list supported registers
output:
available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11 r12 r13 r14 r15 r16
r17 r18 r19 r20 r21
This short patch series adds the ability to sample the interrupted
machine state for each hardware sample.
To test this patchset,
Eg:
$ perf record -I? # list supported registers
output:
available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11 r12 r13 r14 r15 r16
r17 r18 r19 r20 r21
14 matches
Mail list logo