Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 03/01/2017 04:29 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:42:40PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: >> The idea of this patchset was to introduce >> the concept of memory that is not necessarily system memory,

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 03/01/2017 04:29 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:42:40PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: >> The idea of this patchset was to introduce >> the concept of memory that is not necessarily system memory, but is >>

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/22/2017 10:24 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 22-02-17 09:59:15, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:29:21AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> [...] These

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/22/2017 10:24 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 22-02-17 09:59:15, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:29:21AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> [...] These

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/23/2017 09:27 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > In itself, the series does very little and as Vlastimil already pointed > out, it's not a good idea to try merge piecemeal when people could not > agree on the big picture

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/23/2017 09:27 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > In itself, the series does very little and as Vlastimil already pointed > out, it's not a good idea to try merge piecemeal when people could not > agree on the big picture

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/23/2017 12:22 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/22/2017 03:20 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Tue 21-02-17 19:09:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] > * User space using mbind()

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/23/2017 12:22 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/22/2017 03:20 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Tue 21-02-17 19:09:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] > * User space using mbind()

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:42:40PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: >> >>>The idea of this patchset was to introduce >> >>>the concept of memory that is not necessarily system memory, but is >> >>>coherent >> >>>in terms of

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:42:40PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: >> >>>The idea of this patchset was to introduce >> >>>the concept of memory that is not necessarily system memory, but is >> >>>coherent >> >>>in terms of visibility/access with

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:42:40PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > >>>The idea of this patchset was to introduce > >>>the concept of memory that is not necessarily system memory, but is > >>>coherent > >>>in terms of visibility/access with some restrictions > >>> > >> > >>Which should be done

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 01:42:40PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > >>>The idea of this patchset was to introduce > >>>the concept of memory that is not necessarily system memory, but is > >>>coherent > >>>in terms of visibility/access with some restrictions > >>> > >> > >>Which should be done

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

The idea of this patchset was to introduce the concept of memory that is not necessarily system memory, but is coherent in terms of visibility/access with some restrictions Which should be done without special casing the page allocator, cpusets and special casing how cpusets are handled. It's

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

The idea of this patchset was to introduce the concept of memory that is not necessarily system memory, but is coherent in terms of visibility/access with some restrictions Which should be done without special casing the page allocator, cpusets and special casing how cpusets are handled. It's

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/27/2017 07:26 AM, Bob Liu wrote: > On 2017/2/24 12:53, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:06:19AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: >>> On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/27/2017 07:26 AM, Bob Liu wrote: > On 2017/2/24 12:53, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:06:19AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: >>> On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 2017/2/24 12:53, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:06:19AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: >> On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] > * User space using mbind() to

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 2017/2/24 12:53, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:06:19AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: >> On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] > * User space using mbind() to

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:06:19AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >> On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> [...] > >>> * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit >

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:06:19AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >> On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> [...] > >>> * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit >

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/23/2017 05:06 PM, Bob Liu wrote: On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] Could you also explain why the transparent view is really better than using a device specific mmap (aka CDM

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/23/2017 05:06 PM, Bob Liu wrote: On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] Could you also explain why the transparent view is really better than using a device specific mmap (aka CDM

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> [...] >>> * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit >>> we get by making the CDM plug in as a node and be part of the

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 2017/2/21 21:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> [...] >>> * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit >>> we get by making the CDM plug in as a node and be part of the

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>> In itself, the series does very little and as Vlastimil already pointed > >>> out, it's not a good idea to try merge piecemeal when people could not > >>> agree on the big picture (I didn't dig into it). > >> > >> With the

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>> In itself, the series does very little and as Vlastimil already pointed > >>> out, it's not a good idea to try merge piecemeal when people could not > >>> agree on the big picture (I didn't dig into it). > >> > >> With the

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:44:06PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/22/2017 01:44 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:44:06PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/22/2017 01:44 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/22/2017 02:59 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > [...] >>> Why can this not be expressed with cpusets and memory policies >>> controlled by a combination of administrative steps for a privileged >>>

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/22/2017 02:59 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > [...] >>> Why can this not be expressed with cpusets and memory policies >>> controlled by a combination of administrative steps for a privileged >>>

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/22/2017 01:44 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15,

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/22/2017 01:44 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15,

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/22/2017 03:20 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 21-02-17 19:09:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> [...] * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit we get

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/22/2017 03:20 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 21-02-17 19:09:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> [...] * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit we get

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed 22-02-17 09:59:15, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:29:21AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > [...] > > > [...] > > > These are the reasons which prohibit the use of HMM

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed 22-02-17 09:59:15, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:29:21AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > [...] > > > [...] > > > These are the reasons which prohibit the use of HMM

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:29:21AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: [...] > [...] > > These are the reasons which prohibit the use of HMM for coherent > > addressable device memory purpose. > > > [...]

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:29:21AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: [...] > [...] > > These are the reasons which prohibit the use of HMM for coherent > > addressable device memory purpose. > > > [...]

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Tue 21-02-17 19:09:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > [...] > >> * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit > >> we get by making the CDM plug in as a node and be part

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Tue 21-02-17 19:09:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > [...] > >> * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit > >> we get by making the CDM plug in as a node and be part

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: [...] > > Why can this not be expressed with cpusets and memory policies > > controlled by a combination of administrative steps for a privileged > > application and an application that is CDM aware? >

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Tue 21-02-17 18:39:17, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: [...] > > Why can this not be expressed with cpusets and memory policies > > controlled by a combination of administrative steps for a privileged > > application and an application that is CDM aware? >

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:39:17PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > [...] >> * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit >> we get by making the CDM plug in as a node and be part of the buddy >> allocator. But the over all idea from the

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/21/2017 04:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > [...] >> * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit >> we get by making the CDM plug in as a node and be part of the buddy >> allocator. But the over all idea from the

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/17/2017 07:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] > * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit > we get by making the CDM plug in as a node and be part of the buddy > allocator. But the over all idea from the user space point of view > is that the

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri 17-02-17 17:11:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] > * User space using mbind() to get CDM memory is an additional benefit > we get by making the CDM plug in as a node and be part of the buddy > allocator. But the over all idea from the user space point of view > is that the

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 09:33 +, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:14:44AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > >  > >  > > On 16/02/17 05:20, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > > This four patches define CDM node with

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 09:33 +, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:14:44AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > >  > >  > > On 16/02/17 05:20, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > > This four patches define CDM node with

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation > >> isolation. Please refer to the last

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation > >> isolation. Please refer to the last

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation >> isolation. Please refer to the last RFC posting mentioned here for more > > Always include the background

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation >> isolation. Please refer to the last RFC posting mentioned here for more > > Always include the background

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:14:44AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > On 16/02/17 05:20, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation > >> isolation. Please refer to the last RFC

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:14:44AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > On 16/02/17 05:20, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation > >> isolation. Please refer to the last RFC

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 16/02/17 05:20, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation >> isolation. Please refer to the last RFC posting mentioned here for more > > Always include the background with

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On 16/02/17 05:20, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation >> isolation. Please refer to the last RFC posting mentioned here for more > > Always include the background with

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation > isolation. Please refer to the last RFC posting mentioned here for more Always include the background with the changelog itself. Do not assume that people

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation > isolation. Please refer to the last RFC posting mentioned here for more Always include the background with the changelog itself. Do not assume that people

[PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation isolation. Please refer to the last RFC posting mentioned here for more details. The RFC series has been split for easier review process. The next part of the work like VM flags, auto NUMA and KSM interactions with tagged

[PATCH V3 0/4] Define coherent device memory node

This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation isolation. Please refer to the last RFC posting mentioned here for more details. The RFC series has been split for easier review process. The next part of the work like VM flags, auto NUMA and KSM interactions with tagged