On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>
> After a little bit of digging around I understand that manpages have
> to be written _after_ the new ioctl call has been added - at least
> that's what I deduce when looking at what Vince Weaver did for the BPF
> support:
The manpage patch doesn't
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>
> After a little bit of digging around I understand that manpages have
> to be written _after_ the new ioctl call has been added - at least
> that's what I deduce when looking at what Vince Weaver did for the BPF
> support:
The manpage patch doesn't
On 5 August 2016 at 09:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:35:05AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> On 4 August 2016 at 10:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> >> This
On 5 August 2016 at 09:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:35:05AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> On 4 August 2016 at 10:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> >> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:41:15AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 10:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
> >> add the
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:41:15AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 10:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
> >> add the infrastructure needed to pass
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:35:05AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 10:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
> >> add the
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:35:05AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 10:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
> >> add the infrastructure needed to pass
On 4 August 2016 at 10:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
>> add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
>> configuration to the driver
On 4 August 2016 at 10:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
>> add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
>> configuration to the driver before a session starts.
>
On 4 August 2016 at 10:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
>> add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
>> configuration to the driver
On 4 August 2016 at 10:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
>> add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
>> configuration to the driver before a session starts.
>>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
> add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
> configuration to the driver before a session starts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
> add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
> configuration to the driver before a session starts.
I'm thinking we want to specify a syntax and validate
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
> add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
> configuration to the driver before a session starts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier
> diff --git
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:42:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
> add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
> configuration to the driver before a session starts.
I'm thinking we want to specify a syntax and validate
This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
configuration to the driver before a session starts.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier
---
include/linux/perf_event.h| 9 +
This patch somewhat mimics the work done on address filters to
add the infrastructure needed to pass PMU specific HW
configuration to the driver before a session starts.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier
---
include/linux/perf_event.h| 9 +
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
18 matches
Mail list logo