RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

gt; ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI ba

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

gt; ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI ba

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

..@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > controlle

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

..@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > controlle

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:24:23PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [...] > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > > I don't think of ECAM support itself as a "driver". It's just

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:24:23PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [...] > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > > I don't think of ECAM support itself as a "driver". It's just

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

A big +1 to the below :) :) :) -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On May 24, 2016, at 13:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi > wrote: > > Hi Bjorn, > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [...] > >> On Mon, May 23,

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

A big +1 to the below :) :) :) -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On May 24, 2016, at 13:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi > wrote: > > Hi Bjorn, > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [...] > >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +,

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Hi Bjorn, On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: [...] > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > I don't think of ECAM support itself as a "driver". It's just a > service available to drivers, similar to OF resource parsing. > > Per PCI

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Hi Bjorn, On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: [...] > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > I don't think of ECAM support itself as a "driver". It's just a > service available to drivers, similar to OF resource parsing. > > Per PCI

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Hi Gabriele, all, On 05/24/2016 03:23 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >> Sorry Gab, I guess I was really responding to earlier messages :) >> >> I don't really have much to say here, except that it doesn't seem >> right to have an MCFG that describes a non-standard ECAM mapping. > > The ACPI table

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Hi Gabriele, all, On 05/24/2016 03:23 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >> Sorry Gab, I guess I was really responding to earlier messages :) >> >> I don't really have much to say here, except that it doesn't seem >> right to have an MCFG that describes a non-standard ECAM mapping. > > The ACPI table

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

..@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > controller > &

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

..@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > controller > &

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

..@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > controller > &

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

..@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > controller > &

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 05/23/2016 06:56 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > The only way this can be implemented is by pretending that the > ACPI/PCI arch/arm64 implementation is generic code (that's what this > series does), move it to /drivers (where it is in this series), and > implement _DSD vendor specific bindings

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 05/23/2016 06:56 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > The only way this can be implemented is by pretending that the > ACPI/PCI arch/arm64 implementation is generic code (that's what this > series does), move it to /drivers (where it is in this series), and > implement _DSD vendor specific bindings

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

n...@broadcom.com; linaro-a...@lists.linaro.org; linux- >>>> p...@vger.kernel.org; dhd...@apm.com; liviu.du...@arm.com; >>>> dda...@caviumnetworks.com; jeremy.lin...@arm.com; linux- >>>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; >>>> robert.rich...@caviumne

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

- >>>> p...@vger.kernel.org; dhd...@apm.com; liviu.du...@arm.com; >>>> dda...@caviumnetworks.com; jeremy.lin...@arm.com; linux- >>>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; >>>> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; >&g

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

rg; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; >>> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; >>> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; >>> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11]

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

gt;> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; >>> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; >>> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

; andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > > controller > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > On 20 May 2016 at 10:40, Gabriele Pao

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

; andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > > controller > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > On 20 May 2016 at 1

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 5/10/2016 11:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the > following logic parts: > 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API > 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. > 3. Use new MCFG

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 5/10/2016 11:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the > following logic parts: > 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API > 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. > 3. Use new MCFG

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > co

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > co

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

在 2016/5/10 23:19, Tomasz Nowicki 写道: From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the following logic parts: 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. 3. Use new MCFG interface and

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

在 2016/5/10 23:19, Tomasz Nowicki 写道: From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the following logic parts: 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. 3. Use new MCFG interface and

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 20 May 2016 at 10:40, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > > Hi Ard > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org] > [...] > >> > >> Is the PCIe root complex so

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 20 May 2016 at 10:40, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > > Hi Ard > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org] > [...] > >> > >> Is the PCIe root complex so special that you cannot

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 20 May 2016 at 10:40, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > Hi Ard > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org] [...] >> >> Is the PCIe root complex so special that you cannot simply describe an >> implementation that is not

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 20 May 2016 at 10:40, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > Hi Ard > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org] [...] >> >> Is the PCIe root complex so special that you cannot simply describe an >> implementation that is not PNP0408 compatible as something

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host &

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host &

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 20 May 2016 at 10:01, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Ard, > > On 05/20/2016 03:37 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote: >>> Hi Tomasz, all, >>> >>> On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >>> On 11.05.2016 12:41,

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 20 May 2016 at 10:01, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Ard, > > On 05/20/2016 03:37 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote: >>> Hi Tomasz, all, >>> >>> On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >>> On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >>> >> v6 ->

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 05/20/2016 04:11 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > Hi Ard, Jon Hi Gabriele :) > In our case (HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06) we are using the Designware IP > that unfortunately is non-ECAM for the RC config space. Yea, I know, and I've pinged them already. > A possible ACPI table solution was discussed

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 05/20/2016 04:11 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > Hi Ard, Jon Hi Gabriele :) > In our case (HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06) we are using the Designware IP > that unfortunately is non-ECAM for the RC config space. Yea, I know, and I've pinged them already. > A possible ACPI table solution was discussed

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 05/10/2016 11:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > This has been tested on Cavium ThunderX server. Any help in reviewing and > testing is very appreciated. Boot log from Intel Itanium 2 system attached. Jon. [0.00] Linux version 4.6.0-rc7.jcm_tomasz_pciv7_test+ (jcm@hamartia) (gcc

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 05/10/2016 11:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > This has been tested on Cavium ThunderX server. Any help in reviewing and > testing is very appreciated. Boot log from Intel Itanium 2 system attached. Jon. [0.00] Linux version 4.6.0-rc7.jcm_tomasz_pciv7_test+ (jcm@hamartia) (gcc

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI h

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; > robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com; > andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI h

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Hi Ard, On 05/20/2016 03:37 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote: >> Hi Tomasz, all, >> >> On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >> >>> On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >> > v6 -> v7 > - drop quirks handling

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Hi Ard, On 05/20/2016 03:37 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote: >> Hi Tomasz, all, >> >> On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >> >>> On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >> > v6 -> v7 > - drop quirks handling Maybe I missed

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Tomasz, all, > > On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > >> On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > v6 -> v7 - drop quirks handling >>> >>> Maybe I missed something in the v6 discussion thread; when was it

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Tomasz, all, > > On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > >> On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > v6 -> v7 - drop quirks handling >>> >>> Maybe I missed something in the v6 discussion thread; when was it >>> decided to

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Hi Tomasz, all, On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >>> v6 -> v7 >>> - drop quirks handling >> >> Maybe I missed something in the v6 discussion thread; when was it >> decided to drop quirk handling? > > I had such requests in previous

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Hi Tomasz, all, On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >>> v6 -> v7 >>> - drop quirks handling >> >> Maybe I missed something in the v6 discussion thread; when was it >> decided to drop quirk handling? > > I had such requests in previous

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 05/10/2016 10:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the following logic parts: 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. 3. Use new MCFG interface

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On 05/10/2016 10:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the following logic parts: 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. 3. Use new MCFG interface

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the > following logic parts: > 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API > 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the > following logic parts: > 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API > 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. > 3. Use

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linaro- > a...@lists.linaro.org; j...@redhat.com; andrea.ga...@linaro.org; > dhd...@apm.com; jeremy.lin...@arm.com; liudongdong (C); > c...@codeaurora.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linaro- > a...@lists.linaro.org; j...@redhat.com; andrea.ga...@linaro.org; > dhd...@apm.com; jeremy.lin...@arm.com; liudongdong (C); > c...@codeaurora.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Subject: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the following logic parts: 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64

Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

Subject: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the following logic parts: 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

rg; Tomasz Nowicki > Subject: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > controller > > From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the > following logic parts: > 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API > 2. Necessary fix

RE: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

rg; Tomasz Nowicki > Subject: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host > controller > > From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the > following logic parts: > 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API > 2. Necessary fix

[PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

>From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the following logic parts: 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. 3. Use new MCFG interface and implement generic ACPI based PCI host

[PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller

>From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the following logic parts: 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64. 3. Use new MCFG interface and implement generic ACPI based PCI host