Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: lan9303: IGMP handling

2017-11-11 Thread David Miller
From: Egil Hjelmeland Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:54:33 +0100 > Set up the HW switch to trap IGMP packets to CPU port. > And make sure skb->offload_fwd_mark is cleared for incoming IGMP packets. > > skb->offload_fwd_mark calculation is a candidate for consolidation

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: lan9303: IGMP handling

2017-11-11 Thread David Miller
From: Egil Hjelmeland Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:54:33 +0100 > Set up the HW switch to trap IGMP packets to CPU port. > And make sure skb->offload_fwd_mark is cleared for incoming IGMP packets. > > skb->offload_fwd_mark calculation is a candidate for consolidation into the > DSA core. The

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: lan9303: IGMP handling

2017-11-10 Thread Egil Hjelmeland
Den 10. nov. 2017 15:07, skrev Andrew Lunn: skb->offload_fwd_mark calculation is a candidate for consolidation into the DSA core. The calculation can probably be more polished when done at a point where DSA has updated skb. Hi Egil Yes, at some point we should do this. But at the moment it

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: lan9303: IGMP handling

2017-11-10 Thread Egil Hjelmeland
Den 10. nov. 2017 15:07, skrev Andrew Lunn: skb->offload_fwd_mark calculation is a candidate for consolidation into the DSA core. The calculation can probably be more polished when done at a point where DSA has updated skb. Hi Egil Yes, at some point we should do this. But at the moment it

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: lan9303: IGMP handling

2017-11-10 Thread Andrew Lunn
> skb->offload_fwd_mark calculation is a candidate for consolidation into the > DSA core. The calculation can probably be more polished when done at a point > where DSA has updated skb. Hi Egil Yes, at some point we should do this. But at the moment it is too early. We don't have enough

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: lan9303: IGMP handling

2017-11-10 Thread Andrew Lunn
> skb->offload_fwd_mark calculation is a candidate for consolidation into the > DSA core. The calculation can probably be more polished when done at a point > where DSA has updated skb. Hi Egil Yes, at some point we should do this. But at the moment it is too early. We don't have enough

[PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: lan9303: IGMP handling

2017-11-10 Thread Egil Hjelmeland
Set up the HW switch to trap IGMP packets to CPU port. And make sure skb->offload_fwd_mark is cleared for incoming IGMP packets. skb->offload_fwd_mark calculation is a candidate for consolidation into the DSA core. The calculation can probably be more polished when done at a point where DSA has

[PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: lan9303: IGMP handling

2017-11-10 Thread Egil Hjelmeland
Set up the HW switch to trap IGMP packets to CPU port. And make sure skb->offload_fwd_mark is cleared for incoming IGMP packets. skb->offload_fwd_mark calculation is a candidate for consolidation into the DSA core. The calculation can probably be more polished when done at a point where DSA has