On 25/03/21 4:14 am, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
> On 3/23/2021 12:19 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 23/03/21 5:13 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
>>> On 3/22/2021 11:12 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 22/03/21 9:53 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
> On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>
On 3/23/2021 12:19 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 23/03/21 5:13 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/22/2021 11:12 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 22/03/21 9:53 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of
On 23/03/21 5:13 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
> On 3/22/2021 11:12 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 22/03/21 9:53 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
>>> On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
On 3/22/2021 11:12 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 22/03/21 9:53 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
On 22/03/21 9:53 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
> On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
>>> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
>>> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
>>> But the ufs host sends SSU to
On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the process
On 3/19/21 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
It would also be good if you could re-base on linux-next.
Hmm ... my understanding is that patches should be prepared on top of
the for-next branch of the maintainer a patch is sent to, in this case
the for-next branch of
On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
> But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
>
On 3/18/2021 8:12 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 3/18/21 5:35 PM, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the process
On 3/18/21 5:35 PM, Asutosh Das wrote:
> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
> But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
>
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to
11 matches
Mail list logo
