On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:39:44 +0100
Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > Do you plan on sending out a v20 series?
>
> Of course, let me spin that this week! Got also few typos to fix in the doc
> and
> I believe an include missing for riscv.
No rush, I'll be on PTO until next Tuesday, and will not
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:13:52AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:40:55 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > > +static vm_fault_t tracing_buffers_mmap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > > +{
> > > + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> > > +}
> >
> > If this is all it does, I don't
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:40:55 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +static vm_fault_t tracing_buffers_mmap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > +{
> > + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> > +}
>
> If this is all it does, I don't believe it's needed.
>
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
> > +static int
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:08:28 +
Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> Currently, user-space extracts data from the ring-buffer via splice,
> which is handy for storage or network sharing. However, due to splice
> limitations, it is imposible to do real-time analysis without a copy.
>
> A solution for
Currently, user-space extracts data from the ring-buffer via splice,
which is handy for storage or network sharing. However, due to splice
limitations, it is imposible to do real-time analysis without a copy.
A solution for that problem is to let the user-space map the ring-buffer
directly.
The
5 matches
Mail list logo
