Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Enable this driver in ACPI land

2020-10-15 Thread Evan Green
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 3:23 AM Peter Rosin wrote: > > Hi! > > On 2020-10-15 03:02, Evan Green wrote: > > Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state > > property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child > > reg property translates naturally into _ADR in

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Enable this driver in ACPI land

2020-10-15 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! On 2020-10-15 03:02, Evan Green wrote: > Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state > property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child > reg property translates naturally into _ADR in ACPI. > > The i2c-parent binding is a relic from the days when

[PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Enable this driver in ACPI land

2020-10-14 Thread Evan Green
Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child reg property translates naturally into _ADR in ACPI. The i2c-parent binding is a relic from the days when all direct children of an i2c controller in Linux had