Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to >> use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to >> use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and >> the unflattening of

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

Hi Rob, On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to > use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and > the unflattening of the FDT can be simplified. > > This commit will

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

Hi Rob, On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to > use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and > the unflattening of the FDT can be simplified. > > This commit will affect the

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

Hi Frank, > On Oct 20, 2017, at 00:46 , Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 10/19/17 13:06, Moritz Fischer wrote: > > < snip > > >> We also have plenty of code that is just not aware of overlays, and >> assumes certain parts of the tree to stay static. > > I would state that

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

Hi Frank, > On Oct 20, 2017, at 00:46 , Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 10/19/17 13:06, Moritz Fischer wrote: > > < snip > > >> We also have plenty of code that is just not aware of overlays, and >> assumes certain parts of the tree to stay static. > > I would state that somewhat differently.

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On 10/19/17 13:06, Moritz Fischer wrote: < snip > > We also have plenty of code that is just not aware of overlays, and > assumes certain parts of the tree to stay static. I would state that somewhat differently. :-) There is very little code that is aware of overlays, and most code assumes

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On 10/19/17 13:06, Moritz Fischer wrote: < snip > > We also have plenty of code that is just not aware of overlays, and > assumes certain parts of the tree to stay static. I would state that somewhat differently. :-) There is very little code that is aware of overlays, and most code assumes

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:51:40AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Rob, > > > On Oct 18, 2017, at 21:30 , Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > > wrote: > >> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:51:40AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Rob, > > > On Oct 18, 2017, at 21:30 , Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > > wrote: > >> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

Hi Rob, > On Oct 18, 2017, at 21:30 , Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

Hi Rob, > On Oct 18, 2017, at 21:30 , Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

Hi Frank, > On Oct 19, 2017, at 00:46 , Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 10/18/17 11:30, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On Wed,

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

Hi Frank, > On Oct 19, 2017, at 00:46 , Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 10/18/17 11:30, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: > On

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On 10/18/17 11:30, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On 10/18/17 11:30, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 10/17/17

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On 10/18/17 11:39, Alan Tull wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On 10/18/17 11:39, Alan Tull wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 10/17/17

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand >> > wrote: >> >> On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand >> > wrote: >> >> On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand > > wrote: > >> On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM,

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand > > wrote: > >> On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: Hi Rob, > With

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rob, >>> With

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rob, >>> With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> Hi Rob, >> >>> With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to >>> use %pOF format

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> Hi Rob, >> >>> With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to >>> use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > Hi Rob, > >> With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to >> use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > Hi Rob, > >> With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to >> use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and >> the unflattening of the

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: Hi Rob, > With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to > use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and > the unflattening of the FDT can be simplified. > > This commit will

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote: Hi Rob, > With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to > use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and > the unflattening of the FDT can be simplified. > > This commit will affect the

[PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and the unflattening of the FDT can be simplified. This commit will affect the remaining users of full_name. After analyzing these users, the remaining cases

[PATCH v2 5/5] of/fdt: only store the device node basename in full_name

With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and the unflattening of the FDT can be simplified. This commit will affect the remaining users of full_name. After analyzing these users, the remaining cases