On 6/24/2020 4:34 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:10:51 -0700
>
>> Did you mean that you applied v4? It does not look like you pushed your
>> local changes to net-next yet, so I cannot tell for sure.
>
> I ended up applying v4, yes.
>
OK, just
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:10:51 -0700
> Did you mean that you applied v4? It does not look like you pushed your
> local changes to net-next yet, so I cannot tell for sure.
I ended up applying v4, yes.
On 6/24/20 2:43 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jisheng Zhang
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:25:16 +0800
>
>> We face an issue with rtl8211f, a pin is shared between INTB and PMEB,
>> and the PHY Register Accessible Interrupt is enabled by default, so
>> the INTB/PMEB pin is always active in
From: Jisheng Zhang
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:25:16 +0800
> We face an issue with rtl8211f, a pin is shared between INTB and PMEB,
> and the PHY Register Accessible Interrupt is enabled by default, so
> the INTB/PMEB pin is always active in polling mode case.
>
> As Heiner pointed out "I was
We face an issue with rtl8211f, a pin is shared between INTB and PMEB,
and the PHY Register Accessible Interrupt is enabled by default, so
the INTB/PMEB pin is always active in polling mode case.
As Heiner pointed out "I was thinking about calling
phy_disable_interrupts() in phy_init_hw(), to
5 matches
Mail list logo
