Hi,
On Mar 11 2017 or thereabouts, Calvin Walton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > This is mostly a resend of the PS/2-SMBus binding (last 3 patches of
> > now 3 years
> > of trial and errors).
> > I integrated both warnings
Hi,
On Mar 11 2017 or thereabouts, Calvin Walton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > This is mostly a resend of the PS/2-SMBus binding (last 3 patches of
> > now 3 years
> > of trial and errors).
> > I integrated both warnings
Hi,
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> This is mostly a resend of the PS/2-SMBus binding (last 3 patches of
> now 3 years
> of trial and errors).
> I integrated both warnings raised by Coccinelle, and squashed 4/3
> into 3/3.
Just want to provide you
Hi,
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> This is mostly a resend of the PS/2-SMBus binding (last 3 patches of
> now 3 years
> of trial and errors).
> I integrated both warnings raised by Coccinelle, and squashed 4/3
> into 3/3.
Just want to provide you
Hi Dmitry,
This is mostly a resend of the PS/2-SMBus binding (last 3 patches of now 3 years
of trial and errors).
I integrated both warnings raised by Coccinelle, and squashed 4/3 into 3/3.
I really would like your opinion on this solution. If we could have a full
cycle in linux-next that would
Hi Dmitry,
This is mostly a resend of the PS/2-SMBus binding (last 3 patches of now 3 years
of trial and errors).
I integrated both warnings raised by Coccinelle, and squashed 4/3 into 3/3.
I really would like your opinion on this solution. If we could have a full
cycle in linux-next that would
6 matches
Mail list logo