Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

Hi, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 04:44:02PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > As far as I know, we're the first nommu SMP implementation in Linux. According to hearsay, thou shall be called Buzz Aldrin, Blackfin is Neil Armstrong. Regards afzal

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

Hi, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 04:44:02PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > As far as I know, we're the first nommu SMP implementation in Linux. According to hearsay, thou shall be called Buzz Aldrin, Blackfin is Neil Armstrong. Regards afzal

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:33:23AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:38:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:04:08PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > * How must the value be written?

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:33:23AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:38:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:04:08PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > * How must the value be written?

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On 05/25/2016 06:04 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: >> * What state should the CPU be in when it branches to the provided >> address? >> - Must the MMU be off? > > Current models are nommu. As far as I know, we're the first nommu SMP

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On 05/25/2016 06:04 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: >> * What state should the CPU be in when it branches to the provided >> address? >> - Must the MMU be off? > > Current models are nommu. As far as I know, we're the first nommu SMP

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:38:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:04:08PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > +Optional properties: > > > > + > > > > +- enable-method: Required only for SMP systems. If

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:38:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:04:08PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > +Optional properties: > > > > + > > > > +- enable-method: Required only for SMP systems. If

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:04:08PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > +Optional properties: > > > + > > > +- enable-method: Required only for SMP systems. If present, must be > > > + "jcore,spin-table". > > > + > > > + > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:04:08PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > +Optional properties: > > > + > > > +- enable-method: Required only for SMP systems. If present, must be > > > + "jcore,spin-table". > > > + > > > + > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

Hi Rich, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > If you really do want a lot more detail for SMP-related bindings, I > could consider submitting a version with SMP omitted for now (since > the kernel patches submitted at this point don't include SMP) and do > the

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

Hi Rich, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > If you really do want a lot more detail for SMP-related bindings, I > could consider submitting a version with SMP omitted for now (since > the kernel patches submitted at this point don't include SMP) and do > the addition of SMP as

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > +Optional properties: > > + > > +- enable-method: Required only for SMP systems. If present, must be > > + "jcore,spin-table". > > + > > + > > + > > +Individual cpu nodes > > + > > + > >

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > +Optional properties: > > + > > +- enable-method: Required only for SMP systems. If present, must be > > + "jcore,spin-table". > > + > > + > > + > > +Individual cpu nodes > > + > > + > >

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:43:03AM +, Rich Felker wrote: > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt | 92 > > 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) > create mode 100644

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:43:03AM +, Rich Felker wrote: > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt | 92 > > 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt > > diff

[PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

Signed-off-by: Rich Felker --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt | 92 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt

[PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings

Signed-off-by: Rich Felker --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt | 92 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/jcore/cpus.txt