> > Actually, it would be probably good to raise the default chunksize a bit
> > for the latter reason. It would depend on which files get assigned to
> > which chunks though how much benefit it might have.
>
> What value do you have in mind? Or should we leave this as a separate future
>
> > Actually, it would be probably good to raise the default chunksize a bit
> > for the latter reason. It would depend on which files get assigned to
> > which chunks though how much benefit it might have.
>
> What value do you have in mind? Or should we leave this as a separate future
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 07:25:11AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:44:09PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 07:25:11AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:44:09PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:44:09PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:44:09PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:44:09PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:44:09PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Le 21/06/16 à 22:43, Julia Lawall a écrit :
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Tue, 21 Jun
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Le 21/06/16 à 22:43, Julia Lawall a écrit :
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Tue, 21 Jun
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Le 21/06/16 à
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Le 21/06/16 à
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le 21/06/16 à 22:43, Julia Lawall a écrit :
> > >
> > >
> > >On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > >>On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200,
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le 21/06/16 à 22:43, Julia Lawall a écrit :
> > >
> > >
> > >On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > >>On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 21/06/16 à 22:43, Julia Lawall a écrit :
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 21/06/16 à 22:43, Julia Lawall a écrit :
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
> > > it supports --jobs, enabling built-in
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
> > > it supports --jobs, enabling built-in
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis
Hi,
Le 21/06/16 à 22:43, Julia Lawall a écrit :
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
it supports --jobs,
Hi,
Le 21/06/16 à 22:43, Julia Lawall a écrit :
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
it supports --jobs,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > Coccinelle has had parmap
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:43:04PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > Coccinelle has had parmap
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
> > it supports --jobs, enabling built-in multithreaded functionality,
> > instead of needing one to script it out.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
> > it supports --jobs, enabling built-in multithreaded functionality,
> > instead of needing one to script it out.
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
> it supports --jobs, enabling built-in multithreaded functionality,
> instead of needing one to script it out. Just look for --jobs
> in the help output to determine if this is supported.
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
> it supports --jobs, enabling built-in multithreaded functionality,
> instead of needing one to script it out. Just look for --jobs
> in the help output to determine if this is supported.
Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
it supports --jobs, enabling built-in multithreaded functionality,
instead of needing one to script it out. Just look for --jobs
in the help output to determine if this is supported.
Also enable the load balancing to be dynamic, so that if
Coccinelle has had parmap support since 1.0.2, this means
it supports --jobs, enabling built-in multithreaded functionality,
instead of needing one to script it out. Just look for --jobs
in the help output to determine if this is supported.
Also enable the load balancing to be dynamic, so that if
34 matches
Mail list logo