On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:49:34AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for the detailed review...
>
> On 9/24/2012 8:06 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> >>The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the detailed review...
On 9/24/2012 8:06 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
> patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running out of >4G
> address space, this would have entailed an additional round of patching
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running out of 4G
address space, this would have entailed an additional round of patching after
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the detailed review...
On 9/24/2012 8:06 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:49:34AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the detailed review...
On 9/24/2012 8:06 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied
On 09/22/12 11:10, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running out of >4G
address space, this would have entailed an additional
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
> patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running out of >4G
> address space, this would have entailed an additional round of patching after
> switching
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running out of 4G
address space, this would have entailed an additional round of patching after
switching over to
On 09/22/12 11:10, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running out of 4G
address space, this would have entailed an additional
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running out of >4G
address space, this would have entailed an additional round of patching after
switching over to the high address space.
The approach implemented
The original phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys patching implementation relied on early
patching prior to MMU initialization. On PAE systems running out of 4G
address space, this would have entailed an additional round of patching after
switching over to the high address space.
The approach implemented
12 matches
Mail list logo
