On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Shaun,
>
> On 8/10/16 12:58, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Damien Le Moal
>> wrote:
On Aug 9, 2016, at 15:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Shaun,
>
> On 8/10/16 12:58, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Damien Le Moal
>> wrote:
On Aug 9, 2016, at 15:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>
>>
>> [trim]
>>
> Since disk type == 0 for everything that
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>
> Shaun,
>
>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 09:09, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
> […]
>>> No, surely not.
>>> But one of the _big_ advantages for the RB tree is blkdev_discard().
>>> Without the RB
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>
> Shaun,
>
>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 09:09, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
> […]
>>> No, surely not.
>>> But one of the _big_ advantages for the RB tree is blkdev_discard().
>>> Without the RB tree any mkfs program will issue a 'discard' for
Shaun,
> On Aug 14, 2016, at 09:09, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
[…]
>>>
>> No, surely not.
>> But one of the _big_ advantages for the RB tree is blkdev_discard().
>> Without the RB tree any mkfs program will issue a 'discard' for every
>> sector. We will be able to
Shaun,
> On Aug 14, 2016, at 09:09, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
[…]
>>>
>> No, surely not.
>> But one of the _big_ advantages for the RB tree is blkdev_discard().
>> Without the RB tree any mkfs program will issue a 'discard' for every
>> sector. We will be able to coalesce those into one discard
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 10:35 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Damien Le Moal
>> wrote:
>>> Hannes, Shaun,
>>>
>>> Let me add some more comments.
>>>
On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35,
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 10:35 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Damien Le Moal
>> wrote:
>>> Hannes, Shaun,
>>>
>>> Let me add some more comments.
>>>
On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On
Shaun,
On 8/10/16 12:58, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On Aug 9, 2016, at 15:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[trim]
Since disk type == 0 for everything that isn't HM so I would prefer the
sysfs 'zoned' file
Shaun,
On 8/10/16 12:58, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On Aug 9, 2016, at 15:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[trim]
Since disk type == 0 for everything that isn't HM so I would prefer the
sysfs 'zoned' file just report if the drive is HA or HM.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2016, at 15:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[trim]
>>> Since disk type == 0 for everything that isn't HM so I would prefer the
>>> sysfs 'zoned' file just report if the drive is HA or HM.
>>>
>>
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2016, at 15:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[trim]
>>> Since disk type == 0 for everything that isn't HM so I would prefer the
>>> sysfs 'zoned' file just report if the drive is HA or HM.
>>>
>> Okay. So let's put in the 'zoned'
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 10:35 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Damien Le Moal
>> wrote:
On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 08/01/2016 07:07
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 10:35 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Damien Le Moal
>> wrote:
On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016
Hannes,
> On Aug 9, 2016, at 15:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[...]
>>>
>>> Can we agree on an interface ?
>>> Summarizing all the discussions we had, I am all in favor of the following:
>>>
>>> 1) A "zone_size" sysfs attribute to indicate that a drive is zoned:
>>> The already
Hannes,
> On Aug 9, 2016, at 15:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[...]
>>>
>>> Can we agree on an interface ?
>>> Summarizing all the discussions we had, I am all in favor of the following:
>>>
>>> 1) A "zone_size" sysfs attribute to indicate that a drive is zoned:
>>> The already existing device
On 08/05/2016 10:35 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> Hannes, Shaun,
>>
>> Let me add some more comments.
>>
>>> On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun
On 08/05/2016 10:35 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> Hannes, Shaun,
>>
>> Let me add some more comments.
>>
>>> On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Hannes, Shaun,
>
> Let me add some more comments.
>
>> On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>
>> On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Christoph
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Hannes, Shaun,
>
> Let me add some more comments.
>
>> On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>
>> On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Can you
Hannes, Shaun,
Let me add some more comments.
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
> On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you please integrate this with Hannes series
Hannes, Shaun,
Let me add some more comments.
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 23:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
> On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you please integrate this with Hannes series so that it uses
>>> his
On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> Can you please integrate this with Hannes series so that it uses
>> his cache of the zone information?
>
> Adding Hannes and Damien to Cc.
>
> Christoph,
>
> I can make a
On 08/01/2016 07:07 PM, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> Can you please integrate this with Hannes series so that it uses
>> his cache of the zone information?
>
> Adding Hannes and Damien to Cc.
>
> Christoph,
>
> I can make a patch the
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Can you please integrate this with Hannes series so that it uses
> his cache of the zone information?
Adding Hannes and Damien to Cc.
Christoph,
I can make a patch the marshal Hannes' RB-Tree into to a block report, that
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Can you please integrate this with Hannes series so that it uses
> his cache of the zone information?
Adding Hannes and Damien to Cc.
Christoph,
I can make a patch the marshal Hannes' RB-Tree into to a block report, that is
quite
Can you please integrate this with Hannes series so that it uses
his cache of the zone information?
Can you please integrate this with Hannes series so that it uses
his cache of the zone information?
Hi Jens,
This series is based on linus' current tip after the merge of 'for-4.8/core'
As Host Aware drives are becoming available we would like to be able
to make use of such drives. This series is also intended to be suitable
for use by Host Managed drives.
ZAC/ZBC drives add new commands for
Hi Jens,
This series is based on linus' current tip after the merge of 'for-4.8/core'
As Host Aware drives are becoming available we would like to be able
to make use of such drives. This series is also intended to be suitable
for use by Host Managed drives.
ZAC/ZBC drives add new commands for
30 matches
Mail list logo