* Andrew Banman wrote:
> Hi Ingo and Thomas,
>
> Are these patches acceptable to you? We want to get these upstream as soon
> as possible, so please send along any more comments you have. If you're
> annoyed by the format of the emails just let me know and I'll resubmit.
>
>
* Andrew Banman wrote:
> Hi Ingo and Thomas,
>
> Are these patches acceptable to you? We want to get these upstream as soon
> as possible, so please send along any more comments you have. If you're
> annoyed by the format of the emails just let me know and I'll resubmit.
>
> Thank you,
It's
Hi Ingo and Thomas,
Are these patches acceptable to you? We want to get these upstream as soon as
possible, so please send along any more comments you have. If you're annoyed by
the format of the emails just let me know and I'll resubmit.
Thank you,
Andrew
On 2/17/17 4:06 PM, Andrew Banman
Hi Ingo and Thomas,
Are these patches acceptable to you? We want to get these upstream as soon as
possible, so please send along any more comments you have. If you're annoyed by
the format of the emails just let me know and I'll resubmit.
Thank you,
Andrew
On 2/17/17 4:06 PM, Andrew Banman
The following patch series adds the necessary functionality to make the BAU
on UV4 operational. The purpose of these patches is to implement the correct
message completion logic on UV4. Also included is a bug fix to add a field
to the INTD payload. This is needed to verify the source of each
The following patch series adds the necessary functionality to make the BAU
on UV4 operational. The purpose of these patches is to implement the correct
message completion logic on UV4. Also included is a bug fix to add a field
to the INTD payload. This is needed to verify the source of each
6 matches
Mail list logo