On Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:52:32 +,
Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:08:50PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> > On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory
> > > cleanup for
> > > the next rc or so, and then
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:08:50PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup
> > for
> > the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that.
> > I've pushed the
On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote:
I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup for
the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that.
I've pushed the series out to my arm64/fiq branch [4] on kernel.org, also
tagged as
Hector's M1 support series [1] shows that some platforms have critical
interrupts wired to FIQ, and to support these platforms we need to support
handling FIQ exceptions. Other contemporary platforms don't use FIQ (since e.g.
this is usually routed to EL3), and as we never expect to take an FIQ,
4 matches
Mail list logo
