On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:29:46AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2021-01-14 20:53, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> Can this be accepted as-is, or should I resend?
> >
> > Peter, can you have a look here as well?
>
> I have no issues, but I was waiting for a response from Andy here. I have
> little
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 3:54 AM Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:40:25PM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> > Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
> > property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child
> > reg property translates
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:40:25PM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
> property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child
> reg property translates naturally into _ADR in ACPI.
>
> The i2c-parent binding is a relic
On 2021-01-14 20:53, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Can this be accepted as-is, or should I resend?
>
> Peter, can you have a look here as well?
I have no issues, but I was waiting for a response from Andy here. I have
little knowledge of ACPI, and have previously made ignorant mistakes in
that area. I
> Can this be accepted as-is, or should I resend?
Peter, can you have a look here as well?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:25 AM Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:59:12AM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:24 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:40 AM Evan Green wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:59:12AM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:24 AM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:40 AM Evan Green wrote:
> > >
> > > Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
> > > property translates directly to a
Very sorry to ping. Is there anything I can do to help get this reviewed?
-Evan
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:11 AM Evan Green wrote:
>
> Hi Andy, Peter,
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:59 AM Evan Green wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:24 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu,
Hi Andy, Peter,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:59 AM Evan Green wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:24 AM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:40 AM Evan Green wrote:
> > >
> > > Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
> > > property translates
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:24 AM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:40 AM Evan Green wrote:
> >
> > Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
> > property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child
> > reg property translates naturally
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:40 AM Evan Green wrote:
>
> Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
> property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child
> reg property translates naturally into _ADR in ACPI.
>
> The i2c-parent binding is a relic from the
Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child
reg property translates naturally into _ADR in ACPI.
The i2c-parent binding is a relic from the days when the bindings
dictated that all direct children of an
12 matches
Mail list logo
