On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:40:33AM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > What brand/model your sata_mv controller is? Would be nice to know to be
> > able to get a "known-to-work" one..
>
> http://supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:40:33AM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What brand/model your sata_mv controller is? Would be nice to know to be
able to get a known-to-work one..
http://supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> What brand/model your sata_mv controller is? Would be nice to know to be
> able to get a "known-to-work" one..
http://supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
-dean
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 07:15:26PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > dean gaudet wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > > dean gaudet wrote:
> > > > > oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i "dd
> > > > >
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 07:15:26PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i dd
if=/dev/sdX
of=/dev/null
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What brand/model your sata_mv controller is? Would be nice to know to be
able to get a known-to-work one..
http://supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
-dean
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> dean gaudet wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > dean gaudet wrote:
> > > > oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i "dd
> > > > if=/dev/sdX
> > > > of=/dev/null" and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this
dean gaudet wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i "dd if=/dev/sdX
of=/dev/null" and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this simple read
test.
for lack of a better test i started an untar/diff stress
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> dean gaudet wrote:
> > oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i "dd if=/dev/sdX
> > of=/dev/null" and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this simple read
> > test.
> >
> > for lack of a better test i started an untar/diff stress
dean gaudet wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
> applied.
>
> In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
> particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
> because that routine went
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that routine went away.
dean gaudet wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i dd if=/dev/sdX
of=/dev/null and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this simple read
test.
for lack of a better test i started an untar/diff stress test on the
dean gaudet wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i dd if=/dev/sdX
of=/dev/null and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this simple read
test.
for lack of a better test i started an untar/diff stress test
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i dd
if=/dev/sdX
of=/dev/null and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this simple read
test.
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that routine went away. Its EDMA handling was potentially racy
as well.
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that routine went away. Its EDMA handling was potentially racy
as well.
18 matches
Mail list logo