Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 04/25/2017 02:37 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > > > > On 03/08/2017 01:46 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 07:08 -0500, Felix Janda wrote: > >>> Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, > >>> and defines corresponding

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 04/25/2017 02:37 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > > > > On 03/08/2017 01:46 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 07:08 -0500, Felix Janda wrote: > >>> Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, > >>> and defines corresponding

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 04/25/2017 02:29 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > In glibc right now we support including linux or glibc header files first, > and this has always been a requirement from the start. This requirement > dictates > that the kernel know which libc it's being used with so it can tailor > coordination.

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 04/25/2017 02:29 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > In glibc right now we support including linux or glibc header files first, > and this has always been a requirement from the start. This requirement > dictates > that the kernel know which libc it's being used with so it can tailor > coordination.

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:29:00AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 04/25/2017 02:45 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > On 03/08/2017 05:39 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> Any header needing compat with a libc includes libc-compat.h (per the > >> documented way the model works). With this patch any

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:29:00AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 04/25/2017 02:45 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > On 03/08/2017 05:39 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> Any header needing compat with a libc includes libc-compat.h (per the > >> documented way the model works). With this patch any

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 04/25/2017 02:45 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 03/08/2017 05:39 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> Any header needing compat with a libc includes libc-compat.h (per the >> documented way the model works). With this patch any included linux kernel >> header that also includes libc-compat.h would

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 04/25/2017 02:45 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 03/08/2017 05:39 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> Any header needing compat with a libc includes libc-compat.h (per the >> documented way the model works). With this patch any included linux kernel >> header that also includes libc-compat.h would

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 04/25/2017 02:37 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > On 03/08/2017 01:46 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 07:08 -0500, Felix Janda wrote: >>> Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, >>> and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 04/25/2017 02:37 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > On 03/08/2017 01:46 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 07:08 -0500, Felix Janda wrote: >>> Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, >>> and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 03/08/2017 05:39 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Any header needing compat with a libc includes libc-compat.h (per the > documented way the model works). With this patch any included linux kernel > header that also includes libc-compat.h would immediately define all > the __UAPI_DEF_* constants

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 03/08/2017 05:39 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Any header needing compat with a libc includes libc-compat.h (per the > documented way the model works). With this patch any included linux kernel > header that also includes libc-compat.h would immediately define all > the __UAPI_DEF_* constants

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 03/08/2017 01:46 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 07:08 -0500, Felix Janda wrote: >> Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, >> and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn are used in >> uapi headers to prevent definition of

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 03/08/2017 01:46 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 07:08 -0500, Felix Janda wrote: >> Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, >> and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn are used in >> uapi headers to prevent definition of

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:51:29PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 03/08/2017 07:14 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > * Carlos O'Donell [2017-03-08 10:53:00 -0500]: > >> On 11/11/2016 07:08 AM, Felix Janda wrote: > >>> fixes the following compiler errors when is included > >>>

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:51:29PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 03/08/2017 07:14 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > * Carlos O'Donell [2017-03-08 10:53:00 -0500]: > >> On 11/11/2016 07:08 AM, Felix Janda wrote: > >>> fixes the following compiler errors when is included > >>> after musl : > >>> >

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 03/08/2017 11:25 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> On 11/11/2016 07:08 AM, Felix Janda wrote: >>> Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, >>> and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn are

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On 03/08/2017 11:25 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> On 11/11/2016 07:08 AM, Felix Janda wrote: >>> Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, >>> and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn are

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 11/11/2016 07:08 AM, Felix Janda wrote: > > Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, > > and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn are used in > > uapi headers to prevent definition

Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH resent] uapi libc compat: allow non-glibc to opt out of uapi definitions

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 11/11/2016 07:08 AM, Felix Janda wrote: > > Currently, libc-compat.h detects inclusion of specific glibc headers, > > and defines corresponding _UAPI_DEF_* macros, which in turn are used in > > uapi headers to prevent definition