On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:27:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>> --
>> From: H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> patch 6b6815c6d5d1dc209701d1661a7a0e09a295db2f in mainline.
>>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:27:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patch 6b6815c6d5d1dc209701d1661a7a0e09a295db2f in mainline.
Apparently some
Greg KH wrote:
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
patch 6b6815c6d5d1dc209701d1661a7a0e09a295db2f in mainline.
Apparently some specific versions of LILO enter the kernel with a
stack pointer that
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
patch 6b6815c6d5d1dc209701d1661a7a0e09a295db2f in mainline.
Apparently some specific versions of LILO enter the kernel with a
stack pointer that doesn't match the
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patch 6b6815c6d5d1dc209701d1661a7a0e09a295db2f in mainline.
Apparently some specific versions of LILO enter the kernel with a
stack pointer that doesn't match the
Greg KH wrote:
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patch 6b6815c6d5d1dc209701d1661a7a0e09a295db2f in mainline.
Apparently some specific versions of LILO enter the kernel with a
stack pointer that
6 matches
Mail list logo