On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> Seeing as I didn't notice this patchest changed XFS (where's the cc?)
> until I saw hch's question I'd appreciate a pointer to that discussion
> as it's long been deleted from my mailbox.
http://marc.info/?t=11943826359=2=2
-
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 05:11:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Also remove the useless zeroing after allocation. Allocpercpu already
> > > zeroed the objects.
> >
>
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 05:11:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Also remove the useless zeroing after allocation. Allocpercpu already
> > zeroed the objects.
>
> You still haven't answered my comment to the last iteration.
And you have not
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 05:11:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also remove the useless zeroing after allocation. Allocpercpu already
> zeroed the objects.
You still haven't answered my comment to the last iteration.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 05:11:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also remove the useless zeroing after allocation. Allocpercpu already
zeroed the objects.
You still haven't answered my comment to the last iteration.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 05:11:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also remove the useless zeroing after allocation. Allocpercpu already
zeroed the objects.
You still haven't answered my comment to the last iteration.
And you have not read
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 05:11:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also remove the useless zeroing after allocation. Allocpercpu already
zeroed the objects.
You still
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, David Chinner wrote:
Seeing as I didn't notice this patchest changed XFS (where's the cc?)
until I saw hch's question I'd appreciate a pointer to that discussion
as it's long been deleted from my mailbox.
http://marc.info/?t=11943826359r=2w=2
-
To unsubscribe from
Also remove the useless zeroing after allocation. Allocpercpu already
zeroed the objects.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 24
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
Also remove the useless zeroing after allocation. Allocpercpu already
zeroed the objects.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 24
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
10 matches
Mail list logo