Re: Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2018-01-08 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hello Tejun, On 01/08/2018 05:08 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Michael. > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:11:00AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> I don't get the above. I mean, if we have the following hierarchy, >> where R is the cgoup v2 mount point: > > You're right, I'm probably

Re: Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2018-01-08 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hello Tejun, On 01/08/2018 05:08 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Michael. > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:11:00AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> I don't get the above. I mean, if we have the following hierarchy, >> where R is the cgoup v2 mount point: > > You're right, I'm probably

Re: Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2018-01-08 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Michael. On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:11:00AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > I don't get the above. I mean, if we have the following hierarchy, > where R is the cgoup v2 mount point: You're right, I'm probably confused with an earlier variant. I might still be forgetting

Re: Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2018-01-08 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Michael. On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:11:00AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > I don't get the above. I mean, if we have the following hierarchy, > where R is the cgoup v2 mount point: You're right, I'm probably confused with an earlier variant. I might still be forgetting

Re: Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2017-12-22 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Tejun, On 22 December 2017 at 01:15, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:32:04PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> I did find the July 2017 mail thread >> "[PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support" >>

Re: Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2017-12-22 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Tejun, On 22 December 2017 at 01:15, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:32:04PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> I did find the July 2017 mail thread >> "[PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support" >> (https://marc.info/?t=15002573551=1=2) >>

Re: Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2017-12-21 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:32:04PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > I did find the July 2017 mail thread > "[PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support" > (https://marc.info/?t=15002573551=1=2) > where this cgroup type was discussed, but I must admit that I still

Re: Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2017-12-21 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:32:04PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > I did find the July 2017 mail thread > "[PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support" > (https://marc.info/?t=15002573551=1=2) > where this cgroup type was discussed, but I must admit that I still

Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2017-12-20 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hello Tejun, At some point, I'd like to add some details about cgroups v2 "thread mode" to the cgroup(7) manual page. I think I understand most of the details by now, but there's one question I still can't work out an answer to: why does the "domain invalid" cgroup type exist? I did find the

Cgroups v2 thread mode "domain invalid" state

2017-12-20 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hello Tejun, At some point, I'd like to add some details about cgroups v2 "thread mode" to the cgroup(7) manual page. I think I understand most of the details by now, but there's one question I still can't work out an answer to: why does the "domain invalid" cgroup type exist? I did find the