Re: Error in fs/nls/Config.in in 2.2.18-pre3

2000-09-07 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Urban Widmark wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > oldconfig always ask about CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE in case it > > was set CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE="" in the previous config. > > > > This is expected? > > It's certainly annoying, especially for people

Re: Error in fs/nls/Config.in in 2.2.18-pre3

2000-09-07 Thread Urban Widmark
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > oldconfig always ask about CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE in case it > was set CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE="" in the previous config. > > This is expected? It's certainly annoying, especially for people building packages (At least the rpms specs I have looked

Re: Error in fs/nls/Config.in in 2.2.18-pre3

2000-09-07 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Urban Widmark wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, G. Hugh Song wrote: > > > if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \ > > -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS" = "y" \ > > -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" != n ]; then > > n vs "n" is my error. > >

Re: Error in fs/nls/Config.in in 2.2.18-pre3

2000-09-07 Thread Urban Widmark
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, G. Hugh Song wrote: > if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \ > -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS" = "y" \ > -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" != n ]; then n vs "n" is my error. However 'make menuconfig' works with just n. I know I should

Error in fs/nls/Config.in in 2.2.18-pre3

2000-09-07 Thread G. Hugh Song
"make xconfig" failed in line 8 of fs/nls/Config.in. --- # # Native language support configuration # # msdos and Joliet want NLS if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \ -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS" = "y" \

Re: Error in fs/nls/Config.in in 2.2.18-pre3

2000-09-07 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Urban Widmark wrote: On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, G. Hugh Song wrote: if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \ -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS" = "y" \ -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" != n ]; then n vs "n" is my error. However

Re: Error in fs/nls/Config.in in 2.2.18-pre3

2000-09-07 Thread Urban Widmark
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: oldconfig always ask about CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE in case it was set CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE="" in the previous config. This is expected? It's certainly annoying, especially for people building packages (At least the rpms specs I have looked at).

Re: Error in fs/nls/Config.in in 2.2.18-pre3

2000-09-07 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Urban Widmark wrote: On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: oldconfig always ask about CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE in case it was set CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE="" in the previous config. This is expected? It's certainly annoying, especially for people building