On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:17 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > > It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
> > > code, I realized that this problem seems to be driven from
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:17 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Andrew Patterson wrote:
It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
code, I realized that this problem seems to be driven from user-land.
On Friday 04 January 2008, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:17 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > > > It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
>
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:17 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > > It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
> > > code, I realized that this problem seems to be driven from
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
> > code, I realized that this problem seems to be driven from user-land.
> > So I performed some experiments:
> >
> > 1. Wrote
Hello,
Andrew Patterson wrote:
> It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
> code, I realized that this problem seems to be driven from user-land.
> So I performed some experiments:
>
> 1. Wrote a simple program that just used write(2) to write to the
>
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 14:15 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > > I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
> > > an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box as well.
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 14:15 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Andrew Patterson wrote:
I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box as well.
Oh,
Hello,
Andrew Patterson wrote:
It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
code, I realized that this problem seems to be driven from user-land.
So I performed some experiments:
1. Wrote a simple program that just used write(2) to write to the
sysfs
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:17 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Andrew Patterson wrote:
It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
code, I realized that this problem seems to be driven from user-land.
On Friday 04 January 2008, Andrew Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:17 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Andrew Patterson wrote:
It looks like this is a shell issue. After looking through the sysfs
code, I
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:15:58PM -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > > I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
> > > an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:15:58PM -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Andrew Patterson wrote:
I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box as well.
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
> > an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box as well.
> > Oh, one other thing. I tried a "uname -r" to make sure I had
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Andrew Patterson wrote:
I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box as well.
Oh, one other thing. I tried a uname -r to make sure I had the
Andrew Patterson wrote:
> I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
> an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box as well.
> Oh, one other thing. I tried a "uname -r" to make sure I had the
> correct kernel booted and got:
>
> # uname -r
>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:31:40PM -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:42 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:42 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:42 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:31:40PM -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:42 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The
Andrew Patterson wrote:
I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box as well.
Oh, one other thing. I tried a uname -r to make sure I had the
correct kernel booted and got:
# uname -r
2.6.24-rc3
x
Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
>>> correctly when returning a negative value
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
correctly when returning a negative value (indicating that an
Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
>>> correctly when returning a negative value
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
> > correctly when returning a negative value (indicating that an error
> >
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
> correctly when returning a negative value (indicating that an error
> condition has occurred) is returned. If a negative value is returned,
>
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
correctly when returning a negative value (indicating that an error
condition has occurred) is returned. If a negative value is returned,
the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
correctly when returning a negative value (indicating that an error
condition
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:31:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:59 -0700 Andrew Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
correctly when returning a negative value (indicating that an
The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
correctly when returning a negative value (indicating that an error
condition has occurred) is returned. If a negative value is returned,
the next subsequent call to subsys_attr_store will have the contents of
buf appended to
The buf in fs/sysfs.c:subsys_attr_store() does not seem to be updated
correctly when returning a negative value (indicating that an error
condition has occurred) is returned. If a negative value is returned,
the next subsequent call to subsys_attr_store will have the contents of
buf appended to
31 matches
Mail list logo
