[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 2017-05-24 14:42:54, li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: > > We are trying to identify who are the people who still need to > > download > > patches as opposed to using git directly, and what their use-case > > I never use the links on the kernel.org main page to download patches, > but > still: can

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 2017-05-24 14:42:54, li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: > > We are trying to identify who are the people who still need to > > download > > patches as opposed to using git directly, and what their use-case > > I never use the links on the kernel.org main page to download patches, > but > still: can

Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT wrote: > On 2017-05-15 14:34:56, francoisvalen...@gmail.com wrote: > > It doesn't work with Firefox-53.0. After quite a long time while > > firefox > > uses 100% of CPU, I finally get a text file and not a gzip file of the > > patch for 4.12-rc1. It

Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT wrote: > On 2017-05-15 14:34:56, francoisvalen...@gmail.com wrote: > > It doesn't work with Firefox-53.0. After quite a long time while > > firefox > > uses 100% of CPU, I finally get a text file and not a gzip file of the > > patch for 4.12-rc1. It

Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT wrote: > On 2017-05-15 14:34:56, francoisvalen...@gmail.com wrote: > > It doesn't work with Firefox-53.0. After quite a long time while > > firefox > > uses 100% of CPU, I finally get a text file and not a gzip file of the > > patch for 4.12-rc1. It

Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT wrote: > On 2017-05-15 14:34:56, francoisvalen...@gmail.com wrote: > > It doesn't work with Firefox-53.0. After quite a long time while > > firefox > > uses 100% of CPU, I finally get a text file and not a gzip file of the > > patch for 4.12-rc1. It

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 2017-05-15 11:42:48, torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: > so the capability is there, it's just not done as several individual > files any more. I've published a news item explaining the new process and the reasoning behind not providing these automatically generated tarballs and patches as

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 2017-05-15 11:42:48, torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: > so the capability is there, it's just not done as several individual > files any more. I've published a news item explaining the new process and the reasoning behind not providing these automatically generated tarballs and patches as

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 2017-05-14 13:59:22, rdun...@infradead.org wrote: > On 05/13/17 13:57, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > One thing worth noting - I haven't uploaded diffs or tar-balls for > > this rc. Those should now be automagically generated by kernel.org for > > the rc's, but that also means that they won't be

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 2017-05-14 13:59:22, rdun...@infradead.org wrote: > On 05/13/17 13:57, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > One thing worth noting - I haven't uploaded diffs or tar-balls for > > this rc. Those should now be automagically generated by kernel.org for > > the rc's, but that also means that they won't be

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 2017-05-15 14:34:56, francoisvalen...@gmail.com wrote: > It doesn't work with Firefox-53.0. After quite a long time while > firefox > uses 100% of CPU, I finally get a text file and not a gzip file of the > patch for 4.12-rc1. It was almost instantaneous previously. I don't > see > this as a

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 2017-05-15 14:34:56, francoisvalen...@gmail.com wrote: > It doesn't work with Firefox-53.0. After quite a long time while > firefox > uses 100% of CPU, I finally get a text file and not a gzip file of the > patch for 4.12-rc1. It was almost instantaneous previously. I don't > see > this as a

Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] [linuxfoundation.org #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

Le 15/05/17 à 17:42, Linus Torvalds via RT a écrit : > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> Can the generated files please be put in the same places that (most or >> all) previous releases have used? > > I will leave this to Konstantin.. There may

Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] [linuxfoundation.org #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

Le 15/05/17 à 17:42, Linus Torvalds via RT a écrit : > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> Can the generated files please be put in the same places that (most or >> all) previous releases have used? > > I will leave this to Konstantin.. There may

Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] [linuxfoundation.org #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

Le 15/05/17 à 17:42, Linus Torvalds via RT a écrit : > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> Can the generated files please be put in the same places that (most or >> all) previous releases have used? > > I will leave this to Konstantin.. There may well be practical reasons

Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] [linuxfoundation.org #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

Le 15/05/17 à 17:42, Linus Torvalds via RT a écrit : > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> Can the generated files please be put in the same places that (most or >> all) previous releases have used? > > I will leave this to Konstantin.. There may well be practical reasons

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] [linuxfoundation.org #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Can the generated files please be put in the same places that (most or > all) previous releases have used? I will leave this to Konstantin.. There may well be practical reasons for the movement. > Oh, and the patch

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #40777] [linuxfoundation.org #40777] Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Can the generated files please be put in the same places that (most or > all) previous releases have used? I will leave this to Konstantin.. There may well be practical reasons for the movement. > Oh, and the patch file (on

Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Can the generated files please be put in the same places that (most or > all) previous releases have used? I will leave this to Konstantin.. There may well be practical reasons for the movement. > Oh, and the patch

Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Can the generated files please be put in the same places that (most or > all) previous releases have used? I will leave this to Konstantin.. There may well be practical reasons for the movement. > Oh, and the patch file (on

Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 05/13/17 13:57, Linus Torvalds wrote: > One thing worth noting - I haven't uploaded diffs or tar-balls for > this rc. Those should now be automagically generated by kernel.org for > the rc's, but that also means that they won't be signed by my key. If > you really care about signing, get the

Re: Linux 4.12-rc1 (file locations)

On 05/13/17 13:57, Linus Torvalds wrote: > One thing worth noting - I haven't uploaded diffs or tar-balls for > this rc. Those should now be automagically generated by kernel.org for > the rc's, but that also means that they won't be signed by my key. If > you really care about signing, get the