On Tuesday 26 April 2016 06:12 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
>> I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
>> The problem is that PMU interrupts are not supported in arc700
>> architecture and it is impossible to evaluate
On Tuesday 26 April 2016 06:12 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
>> I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
>> The problem is that PMU interrupts are not supported in arc700
>> architecture and it is impossible to evaluate
On Wednesday 27 April 2016 08:43 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 12:42 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
> On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
> I think what we have now is sufficient - but u seem to want a prettier
> failure output.
>
> Anyhow, this print is
On Wednesday 27 April 2016 08:43 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 12:42 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
> On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
> I think what we have now is sufficient - but u seem to want a prettier
> failure output.
>
> Anyhow, this print is
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 12:42 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
I think what we have now is sufficient - but u seem to want a prettier failure
output.
Anyhow, this print is coming from util/evsel.c: perf_evsel__open_strerror()
At the very least you
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 12:42 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
I think what we have now is sufficient - but u seem to want a prettier failure
output.
Anyhow, this print is coming from util/evsel.c: perf_evsel__open_strerror()
At the very least you
On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
> I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
> The problem is that PMU interrupts are not supported in arc700
> architecture and it is impossible to evaluate `perf record` command.
> In our perf implementation we set
On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
> I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
> The problem is that PMU interrupts are not supported in arc700
> architecture and it is impossible to evaluate `perf record` command.
> In our perf implementation we set
I wonder if there are any thoughts about this question.
Please treat this as a polite reminder to take a look to this problem.
Regards,
Lada
On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 16:25 +0300, Lada Trimasova wrote:
I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
The problem is that PMU
I wonder if there are any thoughts about this question.
Please treat this as a polite reminder to take a look to this problem.
Regards,
Lada
On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 16:25 +0300, Lada Trimasova wrote:
I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
The problem is that PMU
I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
The problem is that PMU interrupts are not supported in arc700
architecture and it is impossible to evaluate `perf record` command.
In our perf implementation we set PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT flag so
core perf infrastructure knows we
I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
The problem is that PMU interrupts are not supported in arc700
architecture and it is impossible to evaluate `perf record` command.
In our perf implementation we set PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT flag so
core perf infrastructure knows we
12 matches
Mail list logo
