Hi Kashyap,
On 2018/9/20 16:39, Kashyap Desai worte:
Dou - Do you want me to test your patch or shall I wait for next version
?
I'm sorry, please wait for the next version.
Thanks,
dou
Hi Kashyap,
On 2018/9/20 16:39, Kashyap Desai worte:
Dou - Do you want me to test your patch or shall I wait for next version
?
I'm sorry, please wait for the next version.
Thanks,
dou
> This is the wrong direction as it does not allow to do initial affinity
> assignement for the non-managed interrupts on allocation time. And
that's
> what Kashyap and Sumit are looking for.
>
> The trivial fix for the possible breakage when irq_default_affinity !=
> cpu_possible_mask is to set
> This is the wrong direction as it does not allow to do initial affinity
> assignement for the non-managed interrupts on allocation time. And
that's
> what Kashyap and Sumit are looking for.
>
> The trivial fix for the possible breakage when irq_default_affinity !=
> cpu_possible_mask is to set
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
> So, clear these affinity mask and check it in alloc_desc() to leave them
> as regular interrupts which can be affinity controlled and also can move
> freely on hotplug.
This is the wrong direction as it does not allow to do initial affinity
assignement for
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
> So, clear these affinity mask and check it in alloc_desc() to leave them
> as regular interrupts which can be affinity controlled and also can move
> freely on hotplug.
This is the wrong direction as it does not allow to do initial affinity
assignement for
6 matches
Mail list logo
