Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds writes: Linus> It's not in my tree, at least. Not in scsi-fixes either. I have been waiting for a "real" patch submission with one or more Tested-by: tags. I generally don't queue something that comes with a "try this untested

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds writes: Linus> It's not in my tree, at least. Not in scsi-fixes either. I have been waiting for a "real" patch submission with one or more Tested-by: tags. I generally don't queue something that comes with a "try this untested workaround" patch description.

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On 05.07.2016 19:32, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: >>> >>> - if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) { >>> + if (rsp->msix &&

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On 05.07.2016 19:32, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: >>> >>> - if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) { >>> + if (rsp->msix && (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id())) { >> >> Did

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: >> >> - if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) { >> + if (rsp->msix && (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id())) { > > Did

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: >> >> - if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) { >> + if (rsp->msix && (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id())) { > > Did this wind up going into an official commit

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: > Johannes, Martin, > > Based on the screen shot/call trace, it looks like this adapter is not using > MSIX. It defaulted back to MSI or INTx interrupt. The code made an > assumption of MSIX is available. There is

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: > Johannes, Martin, > > Based on the screen shot/call trace, it looks like this adapter is not using > MSIX. It defaulted back to MSI or INTx interrupt. The code made an > assumption of MSIX is available. There is no point in go through

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2016, 14:52 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > On 24.06.2016 16:19, George Spelvin wrote: > > > > Here's a regression you might add.   > Thx, added. > Probably the same bug as  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119861 and already fixed in the last -rc. Regards,

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2016, 14:52 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > On 24.06.2016 16:19, George Spelvin wrote: > > > > Here's a regression you might add.   > Thx, added. > Probably the same bug as  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119861 and already fixed in the last -rc. Regards,

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On 24.06.2016 16:19, George Spelvin wrote: > Here's a regression you might add. Thx, added. > I only reported it to dri-devel, > since it's DRI-specific, but since there's been thunderous silence > for a few weeks, I'm trying to be a squeakier wheel. Added the nouveau developers to CC, maybe

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On 24.06.2016 16:19, George Spelvin wrote: > Here's a regression you might add. Thx, added. > I only reported it to dri-devel, > since it's DRI-specific, but since there's been thunderous silence > for a few weeks, I'm trying to be a squeakier wheel. Added the nouveau developers to CC, maybe

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Linus Torvalds writes: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: >> >> >> QT: setting up the interrupt vector does not mean the interrupt starts >> firing immediately. > > Actually, it very much can mean that. If the interrupt

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Linus Torvalds writes: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: >> >> >> QT: setting up the interrupt vector does not mean the interrupt starts >> firing immediately. > > Actually, it very much can mean that. If the interrupt can possibly be > shared, there is a very real

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: > > > QT: setting up the interrupt vector does not mean the interrupt starts firing > immediately. Actually, it very much can mean that. If the interrupt can possibly be shared, there is a very real possibility of it

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Quinn Tran wrote: > > > QT: setting up the interrupt vector does not mean the interrupt starts firing > immediately. Actually, it very much can mean that. If the interrupt can possibly be shared, there is a very real possibility of it fiding immediately. Now,

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

h Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressi...@leemhuis.info>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-scsi <linux-s...@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19 >[+ Cc linux-s...@vger.kernel.org ]

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

-Original Message- From: Johannes Thumshirn Date: Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 12:22 AM To: Quinn Tran Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Linus Torvalds , Josh Boyer , Thorsten Leemhuis , linux-kernel , linux-scsi Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

[+ Cc linux-s...@vger.kernel.org ] On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:57:35PM +, Quinn Tran wrote: > Johannes, Martin, > > Based on the screen shot/call trace, it looks like this adapter is not using > MSIX. It defaulted back to MSI or INTx interrupt. The code made an > assumption of MSIX is

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

[+ Cc linux-s...@vger.kernel.org ] On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:57:35PM +, Quinn Tran wrote: > Johannes, Martin, > > Based on the screen shot/call trace, it looks like this adapter is not using > MSIX. It defaulted back to MSI or INTx interrupt. The code made an > assumption of MSIX is

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressi...@leemhuis.info>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Quinn Tran <quinn.t...@qlogic.com> Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19 >On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:25:18PM -0

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

* then set it here. */ Regards, Quinn Tran -Original Message- From: Johannes Thumshirn Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 at 4:51 AM To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Josh Boyer , Thorsten Leemhuis , linux-kernel , Quinn Tran Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:25:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > "Linus" == Linus Torvalds writes: > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348342 > > This first one appears to be a crash in a USB sound doodad and not > qla2xxx. Also, this

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:25:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > "Linus" == Linus Torvalds writes: > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348342 > > This first one appears to be a crash in a USB sound doodad and not > qla2xxx. Also, this appears to be where the 4.5.5 ->

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Thorsten Leemhuis writes: > Description:ath10k no longer authenticates and freezes system > Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119151 > Latest status: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/152513/focus=152535 >

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Thorsten Leemhuis writes: > Description:ath10k no longer authenticates and freezes system > Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119151 > Latest status: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/152513/focus=152535 > Date rep/stat: 2016-05-27 /

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.peter...@oracle.com>, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressi...@leemhuis.info>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Quinn Tran <quinn.t...@qlogic.com> Subject: Re:

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

inux-kernel , Quinn Tran Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19 >>>>>> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds writes: > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348342 > >This first one appears to be a crash in a USB sound

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds writes: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348342 This first one appears to be a crash in a USB sound doodad and not qla2xxx. Also, this appears to be where the 4.5.5 -> 4.5.6 notion comes from. So we can probably

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds writes: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348342 This first one appears to be a crash in a USB sound doodad and not qla2xxx. Also, this appears to be where the 4.5.5 -> 4.5.6 notion comes from. So we can probably ignore 4.5.5 as the last good

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis >> wrote: >>> Description:BUG: unable to

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis >> wrote: >>> Description:BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference […] >>>

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: >> Description:BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference […] >> qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x49/0x4b0

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: >> Description:BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference […] >> qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x49/0x4b0 [qla2xxx] >> Report:

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Description:BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference […] > qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x49/0x4b0 [qla2xxx] > Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120201 > Latest

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Description:BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference […] > qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x49/0x4b0 [qla2xxx] > Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120201 > Latest status: n/a > Date rep/stat:

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Another important one is the rename regression in XFS and ext4 that I suspect is due the VFS changes in 4.7: http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2016-June/049138.html http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2016-June/049309.html possibly related: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=146605889024559=2

Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Another important one is the rename regression in XFS and ext4 that I suspect is due the VFS changes in 4.7: http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2016-June/049138.html http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2016-June/049309.html possibly related: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=146605889024559=2

Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Hi! Here is my second regression report for 4.7. It has 19 entries; 8 of them are new; 8 regressions were fixed since the last report (those are not included in this report) and I dropped 2 which turned out to not be regressions after all (at least that's what I think right now). FWIW, it's

Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

Hi! Here is my second regression report for 4.7. It has 19 entries; 8 of them are new; 8 regressions were fixed since the last report (those are not included in this report) and I dropped 2 which turned out to not be regressions after all (at least that's what I think right now). FWIW, it's