Re: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add support for zstd compressed modules

2021-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:31 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:10 PM Piotr Gorski wrote: > > > > I originally posted the patch in a different form [1] even before > > Masahiro's changes. > > I've been testing this solution since December last year and posted it in > > March

Re: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add support for zstd compressed modules

2021-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:10 PM Piotr Gorski wrote: > > I originally posted the patch in a different form [1] even before Masahiro's > changes. > I've been testing this solution since December last year and posted it in > March this year, > after I made sure everything was working fine. This

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add support for zstd compressed modules

2021-04-09 Thread Piotr Gorski
I originally posted the patch in a different form [1] even before Masahiro's changes. I've been testing this solution since December last year and posted it in March this year, after I made sure everything was working fine. This patch was tested by Oleksandr and he also didn't report any

Re: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add support for zstd compressed modules

2021-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:05 PM Piotr Gorski wrote: > > No, the --rm option is essential. xz and gzip have the --rm option built in > as opposed to zstd, which is why I used it. I've been using zstd module > compression since last december (although I set a different compression level > on

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add support for zstd compressed modules

2021-04-08 Thread Piotr Gorski
No, the --rm option is essential. xz and gzip have the --rm option built in as opposed to zstd, which is why I used it. I've been using zstd module compression since last december (although I set a different compression level on mine) and everything works fine. Oleksandr also tested it at his