Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-09 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 08.09.2007 19:49, Stefan Richter wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 08.09.2007 01:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: > [backports to -stable] >>> Linux will suck really if one breaks so-called stable thing easily >>> without actually testing. For stable stuff, "it should be good" isn't >>> enough.

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-09 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 08.09.2007 19:49, Stefan Richter wrote: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 08.09.2007 01:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: [backports to -stable] Linux will suck really if one breaks so-called stable thing easily without actually testing. For stable stuff, it should be good isn't enough. It must be: it

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-08 Thread Stefan Richter
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 08.09.2007 01:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: [backports to -stable] >> Linux will suck really if one breaks so-called stable thing easily >> without actually testing. For stable stuff, "it should be good" isn't >> enough. It must be: "it IS good." This applies (or should

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-08 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 08.09.2007 01:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:42:36 +0200, > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > [...] >> Sorry, but why? >> It's just this line afaics... >> + SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1179, 0xff50, "TOSHIBA A305", ALC268_TOSHIBA), >> ...which afaics is doing nothing more then "if DMI-Data

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-08 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 08.09.2007 01:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:42:36 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: [...] Sorry, but why? It's just this line afaics... + SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1179, 0xff50, TOSHIBA A305, ALC268_TOSHIBA), ...which afaics is doing nothing more then if DMI-Data matches FOO

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-08 Thread Stefan Richter
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 08.09.2007 01:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: [backports to -stable] Linux will suck really if one breaks so-called stable thing easily without actually testing. For stable stuff, it should be good isn't enough. It must be: it IS good. This applies (or should apply...)

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:59:07 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 21:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > >>> Ah good. I added it to ALSA HG tree now. > > Thanks. BTW, is anywhere visible the current hg tree? It seems that >

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:42:36 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:04:01 +0200, > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> On 07.09.2007 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>> At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200, > >>> Romano Giannetti wrote: >

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 21:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>> Ah good. I added it to ALSA HG tree now. Thanks. BTW, is anywhere visible the current hg tree? It seems that http://hg-mirror.alsa-project.org/alsa-kernel/ lags a bit behind... > It's

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:04:01 +0200, > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 07.09.2007 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200, >>> Romano Giannetti wrote: Takashi: good news! diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel? (was: Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22)

2007-09-07 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:04:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 07.09.2007 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200, > > Romano Giannetti wrote: > >> Takashi: good news! > >> > >> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c > >> index

easy alsa patches for the stable kernel? (was: Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22)

2007-09-07 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 07.09.2007 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200, > Romano Giannetti wrote: >> Takashi: good news! >> >> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c >> index 3557865..496d119 100644 >> --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c >> +++

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel? (was: Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 - 2.6.22)

2007-09-07 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:04:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 07.09.2007 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: Takashi: good news! diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c index 3557865..496d119

easy alsa patches for the stable kernel? (was: Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 - 2.6.22)

2007-09-07 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 07.09.2007 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: Takashi: good news! diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c index 3557865..496d119 100644 --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c +++

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:04:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 07.09.2007 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: Takashi: good news! diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 21:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: Ah good. I added it to ALSA HG tree now. Thanks. BTW, is anywhere visible the current hg tree? It seems that http://hg-mirror.alsa-project.org/alsa-kernel/ lags a bit behind... It's just

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:42:36 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:04:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 07.09.2007 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:22:27 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: Takashi: good news!

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:59:07 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 21:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: Ah good. I added it to ALSA HG tree now. Thanks. BTW, is anywhere visible the current hg tree? It seems that