linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Changes since 20210406: The keys tree gained a conflict against the integrity tree. The scsi tree gained a conflict against the scsi-fixes tree. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the block tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9568 8979 files changed,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 06:05:02PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:10:48AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 04/07/17 08:08, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> Changes since 20170406: > > >> > > > > > > on

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 06:05:02PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:10:48AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 04/07/17 08:08, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> Changes since 20170406: > > >> > > > > > > on

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:10:48AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/07/17 08:08, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20170406: > >> > > > > on i386: > > > > ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:10:48AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/07/17 08:08, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20170406: > >> > > > > on i386: > > > > ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

On 04/07/17 08:08, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20170406: >> > > on i386: > > ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! > > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap > or when built-in: fs/built-in.o: In

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

On 04/07/17 08:08, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20170406: >> > > on i386: > > ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! > > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap > or when built-in: fs/built-in.o: In function

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20170406: > on i386: ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! Reported-by: Randy Dunlap -- ~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (btrfs)

On 04/07/17 01:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20170406: > on i386: ERROR: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! Reported-by: Randy Dunlap -- ~Randy

linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Changes since 20170406: The vfs tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and vfs trees The kvm-ppc tree gained a conflict against the kvm tree and a build failure for which I reverted 4 commits. The kvms390 tree gained conflicts

linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Changes since 20170406: The vfs tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and vfs trees The kvm-ppc tree gained a conflict against the kvm tree and a build failure for which I reverted 4 commits. The kvms390 tree gained conflicts

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:32:51PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > My patch at : https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/4/236 fixes the build for > defconfig and allmodconfig. I have not checked the patch with other builds. This is fixed locally; I just haven't pushed a fresh branch, sorry ... Ralf

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:32:51PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > My patch at : https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/4/236 fixes the build for > defconfig and allmodconfig. I have not checked the patch with other builds. This is fixed locally; I just haven't pushed a fresh branch, sorry ... Ralf

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

On Thursday 07 April 2016 10:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20160406: All the mips builds are failing since last few days. My patch at : https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/4/236 fixes the build for defconfig and allmodconfig. I have not checked the patch with other builds.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

On Thursday 07 April 2016 10:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20160406: All the mips builds are failing since last few days. My patch at : https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/4/236 fixes the build for defconfig and allmodconfig. I have not checked the patch with other builds.

linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Changes since 20160406: The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2722 2566 files changed, 106575 insertions(+), 66077 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Changes since 20160406: The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2722 2566 files changed, 106575 insertions(+), 66077 deletions(-)

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (build failure: mips:bcm63xx_defconfig)

On 07/04/15 10:16, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:08:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20150402: >> >> The arm-soc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. >> >> The omap tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (build failure: mips:bcm63xx_defconfig)

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:08:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150402: > > The arm-soc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > The omap tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix > patch. > > The arm64 tree gained a

linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Changes since 20150402: The arm-soc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The omap tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The arm64 tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net

linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Changes since 20150402: The arm-soc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The omap tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The arm64 tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (build failure: mips:bcm63xx_defconfig)

On 07/04/15 10:16, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:08:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150402: The arm-soc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The omap tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 7 (build failure: mips:bcm63xx_defconfig)

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:08:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150402: The arm-soc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The omap tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The arm64 tree gained a conflict

linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Please do not add material intended for v3.16 to your linux-next included branches until after v3.15-rc1 is released. This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140403: Dropped trees: akpm-current, akpm (too complex conflicts) Removed tree:

linux-next: Tree for Apr 7

Hi all, Please do not add material intended for v3.16 to your linux-next included branches until after v3.15-rc1 is released. This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140403: Dropped trees: akpm-current, akpm (too complex conflicts) Removed tree: