Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:46:33 +0300 Daniel Baluta
wrote:
>
> > I added the following fix for today (include/sound/sof/header.h
> > probably should have something similar):
>
> Thanks for doing this! Is this patch in linux-next already? I couldn't find
> it.
Its part of the commit
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:04 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/sound/sof/dai-imx.h:11,
> from :
>
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/sound/sof/dai-imx.h:11,
from :
include/sound/sof/header.h:125:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t'
125 | uint32_t size; /**< size of
Looks like the merge resolution is not quite right.
I have used the sound-asoc tree from next-20190808 for today.
I am still getting this failure ...
Intel people, any thoughts?
I provided a solution on alsa-devel yesterday, see 'ASoC: SOF: fix HDA
direct MMIO access'
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:16:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:08:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dsp.c: In function 'hda_resume':
> > sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dsp.c:360:22: error: 'hlink' undeclared (first use
> > in this function)
> >
Hi all,
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:08:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kobject.h:19,
> from include/linux/device.h:16,
>
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/kobject.h:19,
from include/linux/device.h:16,
from include/sound/hdaudio.h:9,
from
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:27:53PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 11:35, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We can't leave this broken in -next for that long, can you please post
> > the patch now if you've already got it?
> OK, but I need some time to setup my environment to send this
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 11:35, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:12:47AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
> > snd-soc-sprd-platform-objs := sprd-pcm-dma.o sprd-pcm-compress.o
>
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SPRD) += snd-soc-sprd-platform.o
>
> > I will send out one incremental patch to fix
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:12:47AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> snd-soc-sprd-platform-objs := sprd-pcm-dma.o sprd-pcm-compress.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SPRD) += snd-soc-sprd-platform.o
> I will send out one incremental patch to fix this issue after my
> business trip. Thanks.
We can't leave
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 08:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "sprd_platform_compr_ops" [sound/soc/sprd/sprd-pcm-dma.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> cce1396936ef
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "sprd_platform_compr_ops" [sound/soc/sprd/sprd-pcm-dma.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
cce1396936ef ("ASoC: sprd: Add Spreadtrum audio compress offload support")
I have used
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:11:44PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Anyway I think what you've done in next, make the code depend on
> COMMON_CLOCK, is the best option. If anyone cares about that driver on
> powerpc platforms that don't support COMMON_CLOCK they should speak up.
It's probably
Mark Brown writes:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:29:55PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Mark Brown writes:
>
>> > Hrm, seems PowerPC is still not using the common clock API - is there
>> > any plan for that? There are some ASoC PowerPC uses so it's going to be
>> > a bit of an issue as we
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:29:55PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > Hrm, seems PowerPC is still not using the common clock API - is there
> > any plan for that? There are some ASoC PowerPC uses so it's going to be
> > a bit of an issue as we expand our use of the clock
Mark Brown writes:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:33:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
>> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4-clk.c: In function 'clk_aic32x4_pll_prepare':
>>
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:330,
from include/linux/kernel.h:15,
from include/linux/clk.h:16,
from
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:33:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4-clk.c: In function 'clk_aic32x4_pll_prepare':
> include/linux/kernel.h:979:32: error:
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4-clk.c:19:16: error: field 'hw' has incomplete
type
struct clk_hw hw;
^~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:39:39AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Mark, could you apply it on your tree?
> And I already took back the API change from for-next branch for
> avoiding the bisection breakage.
> > Or let me pull your tree into mine.
> ... so Mark, please send a pull request to me
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:37:25 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 03:18:23 +0100,
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 03:18:23 +0100,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/xilinx/xlnx_formatter_pcm.c: In function 'xlnx_formatter_pcm_new':
>
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/xilinx/xlnx_formatter_pcm.c: In function 'xlnx_formatter_pcm_new':
sound/soc/xilinx/xlnx_formatter_pcm.c:539:9: error: void value not ignored as
it ought to be
return
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:51:13AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
> 81e9b0a07889 ("ASoC: topology: Give more data to clients via callbacks")
> I have used the sound-aoc tree from next-20180416 again today.
Ugh, reverted that and the following commit which depends on it.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:51:13AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
> 81e9b0a07889 ("ASoC: topology: Give more data to clients via callbacks")
> I have used the sound-aoc tree from next-20180416 again today.
Ugh, reverted that and the following commit which depends on it.
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c: In function 'skl_fill_sink_instance_id':
sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c:833:45: error: 'struct skl_kpb_params'
has no member named 'u'
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c: In function 'skl_fill_sink_instance_id':
sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c:833:45: error: 'struct skl_kpb_params'
has no member named 'u'
Brown; Liam Girdwood
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
Hi all,
I think I miss the header file (#include ) I will fix it ASAP.
Sorry about that.
Thanks!
Regards,
Shuming Fan
-Original Message
Brown; Liam Girdwood
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
Hi all,
I think I miss the header file (#include ) I will fix it ASAP.
Sorry about that.
Thanks!
Regards,
Shuming Fan
-Original Message
List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Shuming [范書銘]
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/rt1305.c:1179:23: error: implicit declaration of function
List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Shuming [范書銘]
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/rt1305.c:1179:23: error: implicit declaration of function
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/rt1305.c:1179:23: error: implicit declaration of function
'ACPI_PTR'; did you mean 'ERR_PTR'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
.acpi_match_table =
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/rt1305.c:1179:23: error: implicit declaration of function
'ACPI_PTR'; did you mean 'ERR_PTR'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
.acpi_match_table =
On Tuesday 27 March 2018 04:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:24:43AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
don't seem to have a copy of that patch,
On Tuesday 27 March 2018 04:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:24:43AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
don't seem to have a copy of that patch,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:24:43AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
> > don't seem to have a copy of that patch, according to the list archives
> > Alex asked you to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:24:43AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
> > don't seem to have a copy of that patch, according to the list archives
> > Alex asked you to
On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:15:16AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
There is a patch dependency .
Below patch not merged yet. We submitted for upstream review.
[PATCH V2] ASoC: dwc: I2S Controller instance param added
You need to mention
On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:15:16AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
There is a patch dependency .
Below patch not merged yet. We submitted for upstream review.
[PATCH V2] ASoC: dwc: I2S Controller instance param added
You need to mention
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:15:16AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> There is a patch dependency .
> Below patch not merged yet. We submitted for upstream review.
> [PATCH V2] ASoC: dwc: I2S Controller instance param added
You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:15:16AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> There is a patch dependency .
> Below patch not merged yet. We submitted for upstream review.
> [PATCH V2] ASoC: dwc: I2S Controller instance param added
You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
On Wednesday 21 March 2018 08:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:30:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Caused by commit
363fe37948e2 ("ASoC: amd: dma driver changes for BT I2S controller instance")
I have used the sound-asoc tree from next-20180320 for today.
Dropped.
On Wednesday 21 March 2018 08:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:30:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Caused by commit
363fe37948e2 ("ASoC: amd: dma driver changes for BT I2S controller instance")
I have used the sound-asoc tree from next-20180320 for today.
Dropped.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:30:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
> 363fe37948e2 ("ASoC: amd: dma driver changes for BT I2S controller
> instance")
> I have used the sound-asoc tree from next-20180320 for today.
Dropped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:30:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
> 363fe37948e2 ("ASoC: amd: dma driver changes for BT I2S controller
> instance")
> I have used the sound-asoc tree from next-20180320 for today.
Dropped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/amd/acp-pcm-dma.c: In function 'acp_dma_open':
sound/soc/amd/acp-pcm-dma.c:714:35: error: 'struct dw_i2s_dev' has no member
named 'i2s_instance'; did you mean 'i2s_base'?
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/amd/acp-pcm-dma.c: In function 'acp_dma_open':
sound/soc/amd/acp-pcm-dma.c:714:35: error: 'struct dw_i2s_dev' has no member
named 'i2s_instance'; did you mean 'i2s_base'?
On 13 March 2018 06:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.o: In function `.da7219_remove':
> da7219.c:(.text+0xcbc): undefined reference to `.clkdev_drop'
>
>
On 13 March 2018 06:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.o: In function `.da7219_remove':
> da7219.c:(.text+0xcbc): undefined reference to `.clkdev_drop'
>
>
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/da7219.o: In function `.da7219_remove':
da7219.c:(.text+0xcbc): undefined reference to `.clkdev_drop'
Caused by commit
fc8f7ea2d6c0 ("ASoC: da7219: Add common clock
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/da7219.o: In function `.da7219_remove':
da7219.c:(.text+0xcbc): undefined reference to `.clkdev_drop'
Caused by commit
fc8f7ea2d6c0 ("ASoC: da7219: Add common clock
On 3/2/2018 7:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c: In function 'cht_codec_init':
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c:137:29: error: passing
On 3/2/2018 7:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c: In function 'cht_codec_init':
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c:137:29: error: passing
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c: In function 'cht_codec_init':
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c:137:29: error: passing argument 1 of
'nau8824_enable_jack_detect' from
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c: In function 'cht_codec_init':
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c:137:29: error: passing argument 1 of
'nau8824_enable_jack_detect' from
On 2/19/2018 5:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c: In function 'cz_da7219_init':
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c:79:22: error: passing argument 1
On 2/19/2018 5:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c: In function 'cz_da7219_init':
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c:79:22: error: passing argument 1
Hi Stephen
Thank you for your report.
It seems added new drivers are not based on new framework.
I will post fixup patch for these.
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c: In function
Hi Stephen
Thank you for your report.
It seems added new drivers are not based on new framework.
I will post fixup patch for these.
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c: In function
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c: In function 'cz_da7219_init':
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c:79:22: error: passing argument 1 of
'da7219_aad_jack_det' from incompatible
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c: In function 'cz_da7219_init':
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c:79:22: error: passing argument 1 of
'da7219_aad_jack_det' from incompatible
Hi Mark
> > Thank you for reporting.
> > It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
> > I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
>
> Dropped.
Thank you !
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Mark
> > Thank you for reporting.
> > It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
> > I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
>
> Dropped.
Thank you !
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:49:44AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen
>
> Thank you for reporting.
> It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
> I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
Dropped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:49:44AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen
>
> Thank you for reporting.
> It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
> I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
Dropped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Stephen
Thank you for reporting.
It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> /home/sfr/next/next/sound/soc/soc-core.c: In
Hi Stephen
Thank you for reporting.
It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> /home/sfr/next/next/sound/soc/soc-core.c: In
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
/home/sfr/next/next/sound/soc/soc-core.c: In function 'snd_soc_register_codec':
/home/sfr/next/next/sound/soc/soc-core.c:3818:8: error: too many arguments to
function
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
/home/sfr/next/next/sound/soc/soc-core.c: In function 'snd_soc_register_codec':
/home/sfr/next/next/sound/soc/soc-core.c:3818:8: error: too many arguments to
function
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "snd_soc_disconnect_sync" [sound/soc/sh/rcar/snd-soc-rcar.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
180d9ef58104 ("ASoC: rsnd: call snd_soc_disconnect_sync() when remove")
I have used
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "snd_soc_disconnect_sync" [sound/soc/sh/rcar/snd-soc-rcar.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
180d9ef58104 ("ASoC: rsnd: call snd_soc_disconnect_sync() when remove")
I have used
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 01:54:47PM +0200, robert.jarz...@free.fr wrote:
> I will resend an incremental version of this patch alone Mark this evening if
> that
> suits you, with the bracket missing in wm9712.c:661 added.
I fixed this already.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 01:54:47PM +0200, robert.jarz...@free.fr wrote:
> I will resend an incremental version of this patch alone Mark this evening if
> that
> suits you, with the bracket missing in wm9712.c:661 added.
I fixed this already.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Stephen and Mark,
This is my mess. And today my mailer is not my usual one, please don't blame me
for its probably awfull rendering.
Somehow, in my last serie, in wm9712_soc_probe(), a closing bracket has
disappeared.
This affects only wm9712.c, not the others, ie. the commit :
- 2ed1a8e
Hi Stephen and Mark,
This is my mess. And today my mailer is not my usual one, please don't blame me
for its probably awfull rendering.
Somehow, in my last serie, in wm9712_soc_probe(), a closing bracket has
disappeared.
This affects only wm9712.c, not the others, ie. the commit :
- 2ed1a8e
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/wm9712.c: In function 'wm9712_soc_probe':
sound/soc/codecs/wm9712.c:675:12: error: invalid storage class for function
'wm9712_soc_remove'
static int
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/wm9712.c: In function 'wm9712_soc_probe':
sound/soc/codecs/wm9712.c:675:12: error: invalid storage class for function
'wm9712_soc_remove'
static int
Sorry for the trouble.
Looks like these rt5514_spi_* functions should be guarded by #if
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_RT5514_SPI)
I'll resend the patch to address this.
Thanks,
Hsin-yu
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the
Sorry for the trouble.
Looks like these rt5514_spi_* functions should be guarded by #if
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_RT5514_SPI)
I'll resend the patch to address this.
Thanks,
Hsin-yu
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/rt5514.c: In function 'rt5514_dsp_voice_wake_up_put':
sound/soc/codecs/rt5514.c:343:11: error: implicit declaration of function
'rt5514_spi_burst_write'
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/rt5514.c: In function 'rt5514_dsp_voice_wake_up_put':
sound/soc/codecs/rt5514.c:343:11: error: implicit declaration of function
'rt5514_spi_burst_write'
nb.auug.org.au]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:54 AM
> > > To: Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
> > > Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Bard Liao
> > > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
> > >
2017 9:54 AM
> > > To: Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
> > > Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Bard Liao
> > > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > &g
: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Bard Liao
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like thi
; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Bard Liao
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:54 AM
> To: Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
> Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Bard Liao
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of t
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:54 AM
> To: Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
> Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Bard Liao
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of t
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/rt5670.c: In function 'rt5670_set_codec_sysclk':
sound/soc/codecs/rt5670.c:2448:57: error: 'codec' undeclared (first use in this
function)
struct rt5670_priv *rt5670 =
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/codecs/rt5670.c: In function 'rt5670_set_codec_sysclk':
sound/soc/codecs/rt5670.c:2448:57: error: 'codec' undeclared (first use in this
function)
struct rt5670_priv *rt5670 =
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s.c: In function 'rockchip_i2s_probe':
sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s.c:649:3: error: 'err' undeclared (first use in
this function)
err = -ENOMEM;
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s.c: In function 'rockchip_i2s_probe':
sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_i2s.c:649:3: error: 'err' undeclared (first use in
this function)
err = -ENOMEM;
Hi Stephen
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_enable"
> [sound/soc/generic/snd-soc-simple-card.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_disable"
>
Hi Stephen
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_enable"
> [sound/soc/generic/snd-soc-simple-card.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_disable"
>
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_enable" [sound/soc/generic/snd-soc-simple-card.ko]
undefined!
ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_disable"
[sound/soc/generic/snd-soc-simple-card.ko] undefined!
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_enable" [sound/soc/generic/snd-soc-simple-card.ko]
undefined!
ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_disable"
[sound/soc/generic/snd-soc-simple-card.ko] undefined!
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/soc-topology.c: In function 'soc_tplg_widget_ready':
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:352:42: error: 'struct snd_soc_tplg_ops' has no member
named 'widget_ready'
if (tplg->comp &&
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/soc-topology.c: In function 'soc_tplg_widget_ready':
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:352:42: error: 'struct snd_soc_tplg_ops' has no member
named 'widget_ready'
if (tplg->comp &&
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:55:38PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:41:15AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > > 8ca9edc837932469b81b8b47ea43a074b6add970
> > > ("mfd: davinci_voicecodec: Tidyup header difinitions")
> > Reverted.
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:55:38PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:41:15AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > > 8ca9edc837932469b81b8b47ea43a074b6add970
> > > ("mfd: davinci_voicecodec: Tidyup header difinitions")
> > Reverted.
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:41:15AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > > In file included from sound/soc/codecs/cq93vc.c:32:0:
> > > include/linux/mfd/davinci_voicecodec.h:31:27: fatal error:
> > > mach/hardware.h: No such file or directory
> > >
>
> >
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo