On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 06:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:14,
> from include/linux/list.h:9,
> from
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:14,
from include/linux/list.h:9,
from include/linux/wait.h:7,
from
Hi Balbir,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:21:31 +1100 Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> I am testing a fix by pointing the ref to a label, will send it out
> (hopefully soon), seems to work at my end.
Fixes the warning here as well, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpDlpETEsg3r.pgp
Description: OpenPGP
On 11/16/20 9:23 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 10/28/20 2:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
>> this warning:
>>
>> Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1d_flush.rst:25: WARNING: undefined
>> label:
On 10/28/20 2:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> this warning:
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1d_flush.rst:25: WARNING: undefined label:
> documentation/userspace-api/spec_ctrl.rst (if the link has
Hi all,
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:23:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> this warning:
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1d_flush.rst:25: WARNING: undefined label:
>
Hi all,
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 18:06:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> this warning:
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1d_flush.rst:25: WARNING: undefined label:
> documentation/userspace-api/spec_ctrl.rst (if the
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
this warning:
Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1d_flush.rst:25: WARNING: undefined label:
documentation/userspace-api/spec_ctrl.rst (if the link has no caption the label
must precede a section header)
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
this warning:
Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1d_flush.rst:25: WARNING: undefined label:
documentation/userspace-api/spec_ctrl.rst (if the link has no caption the label
must precede a section header)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:25:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 19:44:52 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 09:00:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Kees,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 01:27:01 -0700 Kees Cook
> > > wrote:
>
Hi Kees,
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:10:05 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> I've pinged the thread of the patch (from Oct 4th) that fixes this.
> Hopefully that or this email will float to the top for an x86
> maintainer. :) If it doesn't get picked up soon, I can try sending this
> direct to Linus,
Hi Kees,
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 19:44:52 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 09:00:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Kees,
> >
> > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 01:27:01 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > I assume CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS is enabled for your build (it should be for
> >
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:28:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> WARNING: modpost: EXPORT symbol "copy_mc_fragile" [vmlinux] version
> generation failed, symbol will not be
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
WARNING: modpost: EXPORT symbol "copy_mc_fragile" [vmlinux] version generation
failed, symbol will not be versioned.
Probably introduced by commit
ec6347bb4339 ("x86, powerpc: Rename
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 09:00:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 01:27:01 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > I assume CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS is enabled for your build (it should be for
>
> yes, indeed.
>
> > allmodconfig). Does this patch fix it? (I'm kind of
Hi Kees,
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 01:27:01 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> I assume CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS is enabled for your build (it should be for
yes, indeed.
> allmodconfig). Does this patch fix it? (I'm kind of blindly guessing
> based on my understanding of where this could be coming from...)
>
>
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 10:24:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:54:46 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 10:24:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:54:46 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > produced this
Hi Kees,
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:54:46 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.ctors.65435' from
> `kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.o'
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:02:57PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:35:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kees,
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:11:37 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:35:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:11:37 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc and
powerpc64 allnoconfig) produced this warning:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS
Depends on [n]: PCI [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- PPC [=y]
Introduced by commit
077ee78e3928
Hi Kees,
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:11:37 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:22:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.ctors.65435' from
> `kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.o' being placed in
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.ctors.65435' from
`kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.o' being placed in section `.ctors.65435'
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: In function 'exc_double_fault':
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:332:16: warning: unused variable 'address'
[-Wunused-variable]
332 | unsigned long address = read_cr2();
Ronnie mentioned that he will take a look ...
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 1:57 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> fs/cifs/smb2inode.c: In function 'smb2_compound_op':
>
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
fs/cifs/smb2inode.c: In function 'smb2_compound_op':
fs/cifs/smb2inode.c:424:1: warning: the frame size of 2736 bytes is larger than
2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
424 | }
| ^
I
Hi Josh,
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:49:09 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> This will be fixed by:
>
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/51a4155c5bc2ca847a9cbe85c1c11918bb193141.1564086017.git.jpoim...@redhat.com
Thanks
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpIcuqnFnGu_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:05:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool:
> .altinstr_replacement+0x1c: redundant
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool:
.altinstr_replacement+0x1c: redundant UACCESS disable
Presuambly introduced/uncovered by commit
882a0db9d143 ("objtool:
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:46:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> warning: include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h is out-of-date.
> warning: include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h is
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
warning: include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h is out-of-date.
warning: include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h is out-of-date.
warning: include/linux/atomic-fallback.h is out-of-date.
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
warning: include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h is out-of-date.
warning: include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h is out-of-date.
warning: include/linux/atomic-fallback.h is out-of-date.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c: In function 'syscall_init':
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1534:6: warning: unused variable 'cpu'
>
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c: In function 'syscall_init':
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1534:6: warning: unused variable 'cpu'
>
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c: In function 'syscall_init':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1534:6: warning: unused variable 'cpu'
[-Wunused-variable]
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
^~~
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c: In function 'syscall_init':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1534:6: warning: unused variable 'cpu'
[-Wunused-variable]
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
^~~
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:31:34 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> True. I'll send a fixup.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpatT5TbuEkF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:31:34 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> True. I'll send a fixup.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpatT5TbuEkF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:28:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> lib/swiotlb.c:748:13: warning: 'swiotlb_free_buffer' defined but not used
> [-Wunused-function]
> static
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:28:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> lib/swiotlb.c:748:13: warning: 'swiotlb_free_buffer' defined but not used
> [-Wunused-function]
> static
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
lib/swiotlb.c:748:13: warning: 'swiotlb_free_buffer' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
static bool swiotlb_free_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size,
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
lib/swiotlb.c:748:13: warning: 'swiotlb_free_buffer' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
static bool swiotlb_free_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size,
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, yesterday's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> kernel/cpu.c:129:13: warning: 'cpuhp_is_ap_state' defined but not used
> [-Wunused-function]
> static bool
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, yesterday's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> kernel/cpu.c:129:13: warning: 'cpuhp_is_ap_state' defined but not used
> [-Wunused-function]
> static bool
Hi Stephen,
At 03/16/2018 01:52 PM, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Stephen,
At 03/16/2018 01:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, yesterday's linux-next build (x86_64
allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/cpu.c:129:13: warning: 'cpuhp_is_ap_state' defined but not
Hi Stephen,
At 03/16/2018 01:52 PM, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Stephen,
At 03/16/2018 01:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, yesterday's linux-next build (x86_64
allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/cpu.c:129:13: warning: 'cpuhp_is_ap_state' defined but not
Hi Stephen,
At 03/16/2018 01:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, yesterday's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/cpu.c:129:13: warning: 'cpuhp_is_ap_state' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
static bool
Hi Stephen,
At 03/16/2018 01:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, yesterday's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/cpu.c:129:13: warning: 'cpuhp_is_ap_state' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
static bool
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, yesterday's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/cpu.c:129:13: warning: 'cpuhp_is_ap_state' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
static bool cpuhp_is_ap_state(enum cpuhp_state state)
^
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, yesterday's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/cpu.c:129:13: warning: 'cpuhp_is_ap_state' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
static bool cpuhp_is_ap_state(enum cpuhp_state state)
^
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c:79:12: warning: 'spectre_v2_enabled' defined but not
used [-Wunused-variable]
static int spectre_v2_enabled = SPECTRE_V2_NONE;
^
Introduced by commit
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c:79:12: warning: 'spectre_v2_enabled' defined but not
used [-Wunused-variable]
static int spectre_v2_enabled = SPECTRE_V2_NONE;
^
Introduced by commit
On 09/26/2017 11:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> kernel/printk/printk.c:1983:12: warning: 'printk_time' defined but not used
> [-Wunused-variable]
> static int printk_time;
>
On 09/26/2017 11:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> kernel/printk/printk.c:1983:12: warning: 'printk_time' defined but not used
> [-Wunused-variable]
> static int printk_time;
>
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/printk/printk.c:1983:12: warning: 'printk_time' defined but not used
[-Wunused-variable]
static int printk_time;
^
Introduced by commit
310b454a8653 ("printk: Add
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/printk/printk.c:1983:12: warning: 'printk_time' defined but not used
[-Wunused-variable]
static int printk_time;
^
Introduced by commit
310b454a8653 ("printk: Add
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/sched/fair.c:2657:9: warning: 'struct sched_domain' declared inside
parameter list
int prev_cpu, int sync)
^
/home/sfr/next/next/kernel/sched/fair.c:2657:9: warning:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
kernel/sched/fair.c:2657:9: warning: 'struct sched_domain' declared inside
parameter list
int prev_cpu, int sync)
^
/home/sfr/next/next/kernel/sched/fair.c:2657:9: warning:
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:10:25 +1000 Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Fixed in my next today by:
>
> d4cfb11387ee ("powerpc: Convert VDSO update function to use new
> update_vsyscall interface")
>
> But you must have pulled before I pushed that, so the warning will
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:10:25 +1000 Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Fixed in my next today by:
>
> d4cfb11387ee ("powerpc: Convert VDSO update function to use new
> update_vsyscall interface")
>
> But you must have pulled before I pushed that, so the warning will go
> away tomorrow.
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi all,
>
> [Forgot to cc John]
>
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:58:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) produced this
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi all,
>
> [Forgot to cc John]
>
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:58:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> kernel/time/timekeeping.c:519:2:
Hi all,
[Forgot to cc John]
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:58:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c:519:2: warning: #warning Please
Hi all,
[Forgot to cc John]
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:58:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c:519:2: warning: #warning Please contact your
>
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:519:2: warning: #warning Please contact your
maintainers, as GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD compatibity will disappear soon.
[-Wcpp]
#warning Please contact your
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:519:2: warning: #warning Please contact your
maintainers, as GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD compatibity will disappear soon.
[-Wcpp]
#warning Please contact your
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> fs/ubifs/dir.c: In function 'ubifs_readdir':
> fs/ubifs/dir.c:629:13: warning: 'fstr_real_len' may be used uninitialized in
>
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> fs/ubifs/dir.c: In function 'ubifs_readdir':
> fs/ubifs/dir.c:629:13: warning: 'fstr_real_len' may be used uninitialized in
> this function
Hi Richard,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:05:10 +0100 Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> The commit comes via my UBIFS tree. But I never saw this warning, I'm testing
> with both gcc-4.8 and gcc-6.1.
> Let me investigate into that.
>
> Does today's tip change some compiler flags?
Linus'
Hi Richard,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:05:10 +0100 Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> The commit comes via my UBIFS tree. But I never saw this warning, I'm testing
> with both gcc-4.8 and gcc-6.1.
> Let me investigate into that.
>
> Does today's tip change some compiler flags?
Linus' tree commit
Stephen, Ingo,
CC'ing David.
On 14.12.2016 08:24, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> produced this warning:
>>
>> fs/ubifs/dir.c: In function 'ubifs_readdir':
Stephen, Ingo,
CC'ing David.
On 14.12.2016 08:24, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> produced this warning:
>>
>> fs/ubifs/dir.c: In function 'ubifs_readdir':
>>
Hi Ingo,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:24:11 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> FYI, f4f61d2cc6d8 is not in the -tip tree, so it cannot possibly have
> introduced
> this warning.
Yeah, I know, but the warning only seemed to happen after merging the
tip tree. I would have expected it to
Hi Ingo,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:24:11 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> FYI, f4f61d2cc6d8 is not in the -tip tree, so it cannot possibly have
> introduced
> this warning.
Yeah, I know, but the warning only seemed to happen after merging the
tip tree. I would have expected it to appear much
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
fs/ubifs/dir.c: In function 'ubifs_readdir':
fs/ubifs/dir.c:629:13: warning: 'fstr_real_len' may be used uninitialized in
this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
fstr.len = fstr_real_len;
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
fs/ubifs/dir.c: In function 'ubifs_readdir':
fs/ubifs/dir.c:629:13: warning: 'fstr_real_len' may be used uninitialized in
this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
fstr.len = fstr_real_len;
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:42:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> > > I don't know the goal of adding those patches in linux-next via your
> > > tree, may be you
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:42:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> > > I don't know the goal of adding those patches in linux-next via your
> > > tree, may be you
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > I don't know the goal of adding those patches in linux-next via your
> > tree, may be you misunderstood how linux-next works and you should
> > remove them. But if
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > I don't know the goal of adding those patches in linux-next via your
> > tree, may be you misunderstood how linux-next works and you should
> > remove them. But if
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 09:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> >> produced this warning:
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 09:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> >> produced this warning:
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:16:48AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > In file included from
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:16:48AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > In file included from
On 07/25/2016 09:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> produced this warning:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:18:0,
>> from
On 07/25/2016 09:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> produced this warning:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:18:0,
>> from
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:18:0,
> from include/linux/clockchips.h:13,
>
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:18:0,
> from include/linux/clockchips.h:13,
>
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:18:0,
from include/linux/clockchips.h:13,
from drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c:14:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:18:0,
from include/linux/clockchips.h:13,
from drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c:14:
Hi Ingo,
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:48:33 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Indeed - and this only triggers on HAVE_GENERIC_RCU_GUP.
>
> I've amended the commit.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Ingo,
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:48:33 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Indeed - and this only triggers on HAVE_GENERIC_RCU_GUP.
>
> I've amended the commit.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> mm/gup.c: In function 'get_user_pages_fast':
> mm/gup.c:1510:20: warning: unused variable 'mm' [-Wunused-variable]
>
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> mm/gup.c: In function 'get_user_pages_fast':
> mm/gup.c:1510:20: warning: unused variable 'mm' [-Wunused-variable]
> struct mm_struct *mm =
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc44x_defconfig)
produced this warning:
mm/gup.c: In function 'get_user_pages_fast':
mm/gup.c:1510:20: warning: unused variable 'mm' [-Wunused-variable]
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
^
Introduced
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc44x_defconfig)
produced this warning:
mm/gup.c: In function 'get_user_pages_fast':
mm/gup.c:1510:20: warning: unused variable 'mm' [-Wunused-variable]
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
^
Introduced
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
sound/drivers/pcsp/pcsp.c: In function 'snd_pcsp_create':
sound/drivers/pcsp/pcsp.c:51:5: warning: format '%li' expects argument of type
'long int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int'
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo