On 15 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
>
> Yes, and for heavens sake don't use it, because the reiserfs merge got
> some dirty inode logic wrong. pre7 fixes just that one line and
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> The swapin readahead code tries to allocate (1 << page_cluster) pages at
> each swapin.
>
> This means there's a big chance of having (1 << page_cluster)
> "self-swap-out"'s at each swapin if we're under low memory.
>
> Nasty.
Actually its
On 15 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
Yes, and for heavens sake don't use it, because the reiserfs merge got
some dirty inode logic wrong. pre7 fixes just that one line and should
be ok
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
The swapin readahead code tries to allocate (1 page_cluster) pages at
each swapin.
This means there's a big chance of having (1 page_cluster)
"self-swap-out"'s at each swapin if we're under low memory.
Nasty.
Actually its even more
On 15 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Now, I'm not saying your filesystem is toast. I'm just saying that if
> you booted up in pre6, I'd suggest a quick reboot into a better kernel
> might be a good idea (be a jock, and do a sync and just push the reset
> button to force a proper fsck when it
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
>
>> Yes, and for heavens sake don't use it, [...]
>
>Too late... First and foremost, a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
> Yes, and for heavens sake don't use it, [...]
Too late... First and foremost, a correction: The VM data I posted was
for pre1, not pre5. Here is the VM data
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
Yes, and for heavens sake don't use it, because the reiserfs merge got
some dirty inode logic wrong. pre7 fixes just that one line and should
be ok again.
>Anyway, this may be a totally
$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
Anyway, this may be a totally subjective (and incorrect) perception, but
it seems to me like the recent 2.4.x-test kernels and thereafter start
swapping things out really quickly. Case in point: "diff -urN
linux.vanilla linux" command swaps out Konqueror and
$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
Anyway, this may be a totally subjective (and incorrect) perception, but
it seems to me like the recent 2.4.x-test kernels and thereafter start
swapping things out really quickly. Case in point: "diff -urN
linux.vanilla linux" command swaps out Konqueror and
Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
Yes, and for heavens sake don't use it, [...]
Too late... First and foremost, a correction: The VM data I posted was
for pre1, not pre5. Here is the VM data from a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$!@#@! pre6 is already out :)
Yes, and for heavens sake don't use it, [...]
Too late... First and foremost, a correction: The VM
On 15 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Now, I'm not saying your filesystem is toast. I'm just saying that if
you booted up in pre6, I'd suggest a quick reboot into a better kernel
might be a good idea (be a jock, and do a sync and just push the reset
button to force a proper fsck when it
13 matches
Mail list logo
