Namhyung Kim wrote:
> I've tested your branch and it seems that it conflicts with Jiri's
> latest perf test patchset which merged into Arnaldo's perf/core branch.
>
> Simple fix will be adding '-Iutil -I.' right after '-I$(OUTPUT)util' in
> BASIC_CFLAGS.
Should I be developing my patches on
Hi David,
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:18:27 +, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
>
>> David Howells wrote:
>>
>> > I've posted a revised version of my perf patches to my UAPI disintegration
>> > GIT tree.
>>
>> Hmmm... It seems to break some things according to Fengguang's kbuild
Hi David,
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:18:27 +, David Howells wrote:
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
I've posted a revised version of my perf patches to my UAPI disintegration
GIT tree.
Hmmm... It seems to break some things according to
Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
I've tested your branch and it seems that it conflicts with Jiri's
latest perf test patchset which merged into Arnaldo's perf/core branch.
Simple fix will be adding '-Iutil -I.' right after '-I$(OUTPUT)util' in
BASIC_CFLAGS.
Should I be developing my
David Howells wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
>
> > I've posted a revised version of my perf patches to my UAPI disintegration
> > GIT tree.
>
> Hmmm... It seems to break some things according to Fengguang's kbuild test
> robot.
Okay. I've fixed that. Revised stuff pushed to the GIT tree.
David Howells wrote:
> I've posted a revised version of my perf patches to my UAPI disintegration GIT
> tree.
Hmmm... It seems to break some things according to Fengguang's kbuild test
robot.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Hi,
I've posted a revised version of my perf patches to my UAPI disintegration GIT
tree. If you look here:
http://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git/shortlog/refs/tags/uapi-perf-x86-20121105
you can see the result.
To construct this, I did the following:
(1)
Hi,
I've posted a revised version of my perf patches to my UAPI disintegration GIT
tree. If you look here:
http://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git/shortlog/refs/tags/uapi-perf-x86-20121105
you can see the result.
To construct this, I did the following:
(1)
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
I've posted a revised version of my perf patches to my UAPI disintegration GIT
tree.
Hmmm... It seems to break some things according to Fengguang's kbuild test
robot.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
I've posted a revised version of my perf patches to my UAPI disintegration
GIT tree.
Hmmm... It seems to break some things according to Fengguang's kbuild test
robot.
Okay. I've fixed that. Revised
This time, I tried on tip/master since it seemed that it contains
related patches already.
At first I got a conflict with davem's change:
--- a/tools/perf/perf.h
+++ b/tools/perf/perf.h
@@@ -57,7 -53,6 +53,10 @@@ void get_term_dimensions(struct winsiz
#endif
#ifdef __sparc__
++<<<
This time, I tried on tip/master since it seemed that it contains
related patches already.
At first I got a conflict with davem's change:
--- a/tools/perf/perf.h
+++ b/tools/perf/perf.h
@@@ -57,7 -53,6 +53,10 @@@ void get_term_dimensions(struct winsiz
#endif
#ifdef __sparc__
++ HEAD
Hi David,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:57:20 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
>> David, where can get that x86 UAPI disintegration patch?
>
> The tip tree has it in branch x86/uapi or you can get it from:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git
>
>
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> David, where can get that x86 UAPI disintegration patch?
The tip tree has it in branch x86/uapi or you can get it from:
git://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git
branch disintegrate-x86 or tag disintegrate-x86-20121009.
I've posted a couple of
Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
David, where can get that x86 UAPI disintegration patch?
The tip tree has it in branch x86/uapi or you can get it from:
git://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git
branch disintegrate-x86 or tag disintegrate-x86-20121009.
I've posted
Hi David,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:57:20 +0100, David Howells wrote:
Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
David, where can get that x86 UAPI disintegration patch?
The tip tree has it in branch x86/uapi or you can get it from:
git://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:43:37AM -0700, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:55:58PM +0100, David Howells escreveu:
> >
> > Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
> > applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
>
> Borislav,
Em Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:55:58PM +0100, David Howells escreveu:
>
> Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
> applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
Borislav, Namhyung, can you take a look at this series?
- Arnaldo
> There are five patches:
>
Em Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:55:58PM +0100, David Howells escreveu:
Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
Borislav, Namhyung, can you take a look at this series?
- Arnaldo
There are five patches:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:43:37AM -0700, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:55:58PM +0100, David Howells escreveu:
Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
Borislav, Namhyung,
Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
There are five patches:
(1) Use a makefile $(call ...) function in tools/Makefile to make it easier
to deal with.
[NOTE! I think the rule for
Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
There are five patches:
(1) Use a makefile $(call ...) function in tools/Makefile to make it easier
to deal with.
[NOTE! I think the rule for
22 matches
Mail list logo
