On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:33:30 +, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> When using a device with UFS > 2.1 the error "invalid UFS version" is
> misleadingly printed. There was a patch for this almost a year
> ago to which this solution was suggested.
>
> This series replaces the use of the growing
Caleb,
> When using a device with UFS > 2.1 the error "invalid UFS version" is
> misleadingly printed. There was a patch for this almost a year
> ago to which this solution was suggested.
Applied to 5.13/scsi-staging, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 15:33 +, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> When using a device with UFS > 2.1 the error "invalid UFS version" is
> misleadingly printed. There was a patch for this almost a year
> ago to which this solution was suggested.
>
> This series replaces the use of the growing
When using a device with UFS > 2.1 the error "invalid UFS version" is
misleadingly printed. There was a patch for this almost a year
ago to which this solution was suggested.
This series replaces the use of the growing UFSHCI_VERSION_xy macros with
an inline function to encode a major and minor
4 matches
Mail list logo