On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 05:28:15AM +0200, poma wrote:
> On 06.04.2017 22:25, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
>
> An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 05:28:15AM +0200, poma wrote:
> On 06.04.2017 22:25, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
>
> An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other
On 06.04.2017 22:25, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
It may be encrypted, but where's the key
On 06.04.2017 22:25, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
It may be encrypted, but where's the key
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
> >>
> >> An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
> >>
> >> It may be encrypted, but where's the key stored, how easy is it to retrieve
> >> and
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
> >>
> >> An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
> >>
> >> It may be encrypted, but where's the key stored, how easy is it to retrieve
> >> and
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:41 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>
>>> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
>>
>> An NVDIMM should be
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:41 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>
>>> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
>>
>> An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
>>
>>
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:41 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
>> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
>
> An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
>
> It may be encrypted, but
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:41 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
>> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
>
> An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
>
> It may be encrypted, but where's the key stored, how easy is it to
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:55 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> You probably want to disable hibernation altogether in this case.
>
> See patch 10. Does that mean patch 11 is superfluous?
Yes, it does.
You can't open /dev/snapshot
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:55 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> You probably want to disable hibernation altogether in this case.
>
> See patch 10. Does that mean patch 11 is superfluous?
Yes, it does.
You can't open /dev/snapshot if hibernation_available() returns false.
Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
It may be encrypted, but where's the key stored, how easy is it to retrieve
and does the swapout code know this?
>
Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Your swap partition may be located on an NVDIMM or be encrypted.
An NVDIMM should be considered the same as any other persistent storage.
It may be encrypted, but where's the key stored, how easy is it to retrieve
and does the swapout code know this?
> Isn't this a bit
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> You probably want to disable hibernation altogether in this case.
See patch 10. Does that mean patch 11 is superfluous?
David
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> You probably want to disable hibernation altogether in this case.
See patch 10. Does that mean patch 11 is superfluous?
David
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2017, 01:38 +0200 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:16 PM, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > From: Matthew Garrett
> >
> > uswsusp allows a user process to dump and then restore kernel state, which
> > makes it
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2017, 01:38 +0200 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:16 PM, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > From: Matthew Garrett
> >
> > uswsusp allows a user process to dump and then restore kernel state, which
> > makes it possible to modify the running kernel.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:16 PM, David Howells wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett
>
> uswsusp allows a user process to dump and then restore kernel state, which
> makes it possible to modify the running kernel. Disable this if the kernel
> is locked down.
>
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:16 PM, David Howells wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett
>
> uswsusp allows a user process to dump and then restore kernel state, which
> makes it possible to modify the running kernel. Disable this if the kernel
> is locked down.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
>
From: Matthew Garrett
uswsusp allows a user process to dump and then restore kernel state, which
makes it possible to modify the running kernel. Disable this if the kernel
is locked down.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
Signed-off-by: David Howells
From: Matthew Garrett
uswsusp allows a user process to dump and then restore kernel state, which
makes it possible to modify the running kernel. Disable this if the kernel
is locked down.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
Signed-off-by: David Howells
cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
---
From: Matthew Garrett
uswsusp allows a user process to dump and then restore kernel state, which
makes it possible to modify the running kernel. Disable this if the kernel
is locked down.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
Signed-off-by: David Howells
From: Matthew Garrett
uswsusp allows a user process to dump and then restore kernel state, which
makes it possible to modify the running kernel. Disable this if the kernel
is locked down.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
Signed-off-by: David Howells
---
kernel/power/user.c |3 +++
1 file
24 matches
Mail list logo