On systems that have large core counts and large page sizes, but limited
memory, the userfaultfd test hugepage requirement is too large.
Exiting early due to missing one test's requirements is a rather aggressive
strategy, and prevents a lot of other tests from running. Remove the
early exit to
On 12/13/2023 4:46 AM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
The test verifies IO writes of various sizes from the guest to the host.
Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng
Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji
---
.../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdcall.h | 3 +
On 12/13/2023 4:46 AM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
The test checks report_fatal_error functionality.
Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng
Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji
---
.../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h| 6 ++-
.../kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx_util.h | 1
On 12/13/2023 4:46 AM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
The test calls get_td_vmcall_info from the guest and verifies the
expected returned values.
Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng
Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji
---
.../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h| 3 +
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdcall.S
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdcall.S
> new file mode 100644
> index ..df9c1ed4bb2d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdcall.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
> +/*
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 6:32 AM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> Add a test for verifying overflow interrupt. Currently, it relies on
> overflow support on cycle/instret events. This test works for cycle/
> instret events which support sampling via hpmcounters on the platform.
> There are no ISA extensions
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 6:32 AM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> Verify PMU snapshot functionality by setting up the shared memory
> correctly and reading the counter values from the shared memory
> instead of the CSR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
Regards,
Anup
> ---
>
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 6:32 AM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> This test implements basic sanity test and cycle/instret event
> counting tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
I feel the test should have been called sbi_pmu_test but no need to
revise this series. I will take care of it at the time of
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 6:32 AM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> The SBI PMU extension definition is required for upcoming SBI PMU
> selftests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
Regards,
Anup
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h | 67 +++
>
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 6:32 AM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> The KVM RISC-V allows Sscofpmf extension for Guest/VM so let us
> add this extension to get-reg-list test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
Regards,
Anup
> ---
>
> On 01-Mar-2024, at 3:48 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Sachin Sant writes:
>> Powerpc specific selftests (specifically powerpc/primitives) included in
>> linux-next
>> tree fails to build with following error
>>
>> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Wer
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:52:16 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> Lol, I haven't allocate the entry data size when initialize rethook.
> That's a bug.
> Please try below.
I'll wait to review patches 5,6,7 as I'm guessing this will have a v3?
-- Steve
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:58:33 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
>
> Remove redundant #else block for BTF args from README message.
> This is a cleanup, so no change on the message.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google)
-- Steve
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:58:23 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
>
> Instead of incrementing the trace_probe::nr_args, init it at
> trace_probe_init().
> This is a cleanup, so the behavior is not changed.
The change is fine, but the change log does not
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:58:13 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
>
> Cleanup traceprobe_parse_probe_arg_body() to split out the
> type parser and post-processing part of fetch_insn.
> This makes no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:58:03 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
>
> Despite the fprobe event, "Kretprobe" was commented. So fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google)
-- Steve
> ---
>
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 3:27 PM Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59 PM -08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > SCTP does not support IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE and we know it,
> > so use XFAIL instead of SKIP.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
> > ---
> >
Andy Shevchenko writes:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 3:53 PM Sachin Sant wrote:
>>
>> Powerpc specific selftests (specifically powerpc/primitives) included in
>> linux-next
>> tree fails to build with following error
>>
>> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Wer
Sachin Sant writes:
> Powerpc specific selftests (specifically powerpc/primitives) included in
> linux-next
> tree fails to build with following error
>
> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Werror
> -DGIT_VERSION='"next-20240229-0-gf303a3e2bcfb-dirty"'
> -I/home/
Mark Brown writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:24:59PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> Mark Brown writes:
>
>> > I believe based on prior discussions that you're running this using
>> > shrinkwrap - can you confirm exactly how please, including things
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann :
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:56:15 -0800 you wrote:
> Replace deprecated 0-length array in struct bpf_lpm_trie_key with
> flexible array. Found with GCC 13:
>
> ../kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:207:51: warning: array subscript i
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:24:59PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > I believe based on prior discussions that you're running this using
> > shrinkwrap - can you confirm exactly how please, including things like
> > which firmware configuration you're using? I'm using
On 2024/3/1 03:21, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 04:10:03 PST (-0800), c...@cyyself.name wrote:
This patch has not been reviewed for more than a month. There is
another patch that did the same fix but in another way and still has
not been reviewed like this. I'm here to do a
On 2/29/24 00:10, David Gow wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 03:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
when running the dev_addr_lists unit test with lock debugging enabled,
I always get the following lockdep warning.
[7.031327]
[7.031393] WARNING:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59 PM -08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> SCTP does not support IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE and we know it,
> so use XFAIL instead of SKIP.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file
On 2/29/24 11:38, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
[ ... ]
Tough one. I can't enable CONFIG_NET_TEST on nios2, parisc, and arm with THUMB
enabled due to crashes or hangs in gso tests. I accept that. Downside is that I
have to disable CONFIG_NET_TEST on those architectures/platforms entirely,
meaning a
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 01:23, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>
> However, I think a better approach would be *not* to add the .gitlab-ci.yaml
> file in the root of the source tree, but instead change the very same repo
> setting to point to a particular entry YAML, *inside* the repo (somewhere
> under
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 2:22 PM Richard Gobert wrote:
>
>
>
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > My intuition is that this patch has a high cost for normal GRO processing.
> > SW-GRO is already a bottleneck on ARM cores in smart NICS.
> >
> > I would suggest instead using parameters to give both the
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:40:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/28/24 02:15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > CC testing
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:59 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 2/27/24 23:25, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > [ ... ]
> > > > >
> > > > > This test case is supposed
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 04:10:03 PST (-0800), c...@cyyself.name wrote:
This patch has not been reviewed for more than a month. There is another patch
that did the same fix but in another way and still has not been reviewed like
this. I'm here to do a comparison of some choices briefly to let the
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:36 PM Mario Limonciello
wrote:
>
> On 2/27/2024 01:39, Meng Li wrote:
> > The min/max limit perf values calculated based on frequency
> > may exceed the reasonable range of perf(highest perf, lowest perf).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Meng Li
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 1:21 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
wrote:
>
> Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
> functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Minor improvements in
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 1:14 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
wrote:
>
> On 2/28/24 11:47 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 3:46 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/27/24 10:18 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:21 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> >>> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 1:03 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
wrote:
>
> On 2/28/24 11:51 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:21 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> > wrote:
> >
> > ..
> >
> >> +static int numer_of_heaps(void)
> >> +{
> >> + DIR *d = opendir(DEVPATH);
> >> + struct
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 3:53 PM Sachin Sant wrote:
>
> Powerpc specific selftests (specifically powerpc/primitives) included in
> linux-next
> tree fails to build with following error
>
> gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Werror
> -DGIT_VERSION='"next-20240229-0-gf303a3e2bcfb
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 4:53 PM Laura Nao wrote:
>
> Add new basic kselftest that checks if the available rust sample modules
> can be added and removed correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao
> Reviewed-by: Sergio Gonzalez Collado
> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
Thanks for this Laura!
Hi,
Le jeudi 29 février 2024 à 16:16 +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov a écrit :
> On 2/29/24 2:20 PM, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 28/02/2024 23:55, Helen Koike wrote:
> > > Dear Kernel Community,
> > >
> > > This patch introduces a `.gitlab-ci` file along with a `ci/` folder,
> > >
Hi Tim,
just replying below to one of your comment which I happen to be involved in, but
I'll let others reply for the more specific comments.
Le jeudi 29 février 2024 à 02:44 +, Bird, Tim a écrit :
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Helen Koike
> >
>
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> >
Hi Shuah,
On 2/28/24 01:01, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Hi Laura,
>
> On 2/26/24 03:16, Laura Nao wrote:
>> Add new basic kselftest that checks if the available rust sample modules
>> can be added and removed correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao
>> Reviewed-by: Sergio Gonzalez Collado
>>
Add new basic kselftest that checks if the available rust sample modules
can be added and removed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Laura Nao
Reviewed-by: Sergio Gonzalez Collado
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
---
Depends on:
-
From: Jakub Kicinski
[ Upstream commit 49d821064c44cb5ffdf272905236012ea9ce50e3 ]
This exact case was fail for async crypto and we weren't
catching it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
From: Jakub Kicinski
[ Upstream commit 49d821064c44cb5ffdf272905236012ea9ce50e3 ]
This exact case was fail for async crypto and we weren't
catching it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
From: Jakub Kicinski
[ Upstream commit 49d821064c44cb5ffdf272905236012ea9ce50e3 ]
This exact case was fail for async crypto and we weren't
catching it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
From: Jakub Kicinski
[ Upstream commit 49d821064c44cb5ffdf272905236012ea9ce50e3 ]
This exact case was fail for async crypto and we weren't
catching it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
From: Jakub Kicinski
[ Upstream commit 49d821064c44cb5ffdf272905236012ea9ce50e3 ]
This exact case was fail for async crypto and we weren't
catching it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
From: Aaron Conole
[ Upstream commit bd128f62c365504e1268dc09fcccdfb1f091e93a ]
Add a test case into the netlink checks that will show the number of
nested action recursions won't exceed 16. Going to 17 on a small
clone call isn't enough to exhaust the stack on (most) systems, so
it should be
From: Jakub Kicinski
[ Upstream commit 49d821064c44cb5ffdf272905236012ea9ce50e3 ]
This exact case was fail for async crypto and we weren't
catching it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
From: Aaron Conole
[ Upstream commit bd128f62c365504e1268dc09fcccdfb1f091e93a ]
Add a test case into the netlink checks that will show the number of
nested action recursions won't exceed 16. Going to 17 on a small
clone call isn't enough to exhaust the stack on (most) systems, so
it should be
Add the dependsOn test check for all the mirred blockcast tests.
It will prevent the issue reported by LKFT which happens when an older
iproute2 is used to run the current tdc.
Tests are skipped if the dependsOn check fails.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
Signed-off-by: Pedro
On 2/29/24 2:20 PM, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
Hello,
On 28/02/2024 23:55, Helen Koike wrote:
Dear Kernel Community,
This patch introduces a `.gitlab-ci` file along with a `ci/` folder, defining a
basic test pipeline triggered by code pushes to a GitLab-CI instance. This
initial version includes
On 2/29/24 2:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb
In some systems, the netcat server can incur in delay to start listening.
When this happens, the test can randomly fail in various points.
This is an example error message:
# ip gre none gso
# encap 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.2, type gre, mac none len 2000
# test basic connectivity
#
Powerpc specific selftests (specifically powerpc/primitives) included in
linux-next
tree fails to build with following error
gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Werror
-DGIT_VERSION='"next-20240229-0-gf303a3e2bcfb-dirty"'
-I/home/sachin/linux-next/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include
-I/h
> On 29-Feb-2024, at 3:07 PM, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>
> When running `make -C powerpc/pmu run_tests` from top level selftests
> directory, currently this error is being reported
>
> make: Entering directory
> '/home/maddy/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu'
> Makefile:40:
Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> My intuition is that this patch has a high cost for normal GRO processing.
> SW-GRO is already a bottleneck on ARM cores in smart NICS.
>
> I would suggest instead using parameters to give both the nhoff and thoff
> values
> this would avoid many conditionals in the
On 12/13/2023 4:46 AM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
From: Erdem Aktas
Verifies TDVMCALL READ and WRITE operations.
Signed-off-by: Erdem Aktas
Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng
Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji
---
.../kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h| 34
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 01:19:48PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> @@ -386,6 +386,7 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *__aarch64_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm
> *vm, uint32_t vcpu_id,
> aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, init);
>
> vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), stack_vaddr +
On 12/13/2023 4:46 AM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
The test checks report_fatal_error functionality.
Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng
Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji
---
.../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h| 6 ++-
.../kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx_util.h | 1
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> > On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200,
Hello,
On 28/02/2024 23:55, Helen Koike wrote:
> Dear Kernel Community,
>
> This patch introduces a `.gitlab-ci` file along with a `ci/` folder, defining
> a
> basic test pipeline triggered by code pushes to a GitLab-CI instance. This
> initial version includes static checks (checkpatch and
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >
> >>> Of course. You're also welcome to
This patch has not been reviewed for more than a month. There is another patch
that did the same fix but in another way and still has not been reviewed like
this. I'm here to do a comparison of some choices briefly to let the maintainer
understand the issues and the solutions. I think it's time
On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>
>>> Of course. You're also welcome to join the #kernelci channel on libera.chat.
>
>> Isn't that a bit pointless if
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > Of course. You're also welcome to join the #kernelci channel on libera.chat.
> Isn't that a bit pointless if it's no the main IM channel ?
It *was* the
On 2/29/24 1:19 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 2/29/24 11:34 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:26:51AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 2/29/24 01:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 2/29/24 11:34 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:26:51AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >> On 2/29/24 01:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:24PM -0300, Helen Koike
On 2/29/24 11:34 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:26:51AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 2/29/24 01:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:24PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
**Join Our Slack Channel:**
We have a Slack channel, #gitlab-ci, on the
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:39:01AM +, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:07:25AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > We have a Slack channel, #gitlab-ci, on the KernelCI Slack instance
> > > https://kernelci.slack.com/ .
> > > Feel free to join and contribute to the
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:56:58AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:23:22AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > On 2/29/24 11:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:25PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
> > > > Which rating
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:23:22AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On 2/29/24 11:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:25PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
> > > Which rating would you select?
> >
> > 4.5 :)
> >
> > One thing I'm wondering here is how
Hi Laurent, Helen,
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:07:25AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > **Join Our Slack Channel:**
> > We have a Slack channel, #gitlab-ci, on the KernelCI Slack instance
> > https://kernelci.slack.com/ .
> > Feel free to join and contribute to the conversation. The KernelCI
Build breaks when executing make with run_tests for sub-folders
under powerpc. This is because, CFLAGS and GIT_VERSION macros are
defined in Makefile of toplevel powerpc folder.
make: Entering directory '/home/maddy/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm'
gcc hugetlb_vs_thp_test.c
When running `make -C powerpc/pmu run_tests` from top level selftests
directory, currently this error is being reported
make: Entering directory '/home/maddy/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu'
Makefile:40: warning: overriding recipe for target 'emit_tests'
../../lib.mk:111: warning:
In some powerpc/ sub-folder Makefiles, CFLAGS are
defined before lib.mk include. Clean it up by
re-ordering it to follow after the mk include.
This is needed to support sub-folders in powerpc/
buildable on its own.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan
---
.../selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/Makefile
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:26:51AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 2/29/24 01:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:24PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
> >> **Join Our Slack Channel:**
> >> We have a Slack channel, #gitlab-ci, on the KernelCI Slack instance
> >>
On 2/29/24 01:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:24PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
**Join Our Slack Channel:**
We have a Slack channel, #gitlab-ci, on the KernelCI Slack instance
https://kernelci.slack.com/ .
Feel free to join and contribute to the conversation. The
Hi everyone,
On 2/29/24 11:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:25PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
Which rating would you select?
4.5 :)
One thing I'm wondering here is how we're going to cope with the
different requirements each user / framework has.
Like, Linus probably
The config fragment enlists all the config options needed for the test.
This config is merged into the kernel's config on which this test is
run.
Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
---
Changes since v1:
- Add reviewed-by tag
---
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
---
Changes since v2:
- Minor improvements in test_alloc_zeroed() results
Changes since v1:
- Update some more error
On 2/28/24 11:47 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 3:46 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/27/24 10:18 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:21 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
>>> wrote:
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
Hi Shuah and Andrew,
On 01/29/2024 04:27 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
On 12/27/2023 03:55 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
+ Andrew Morton
+ Mark Brown
On 12/13/2023 09:22 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
v3: Rebase on the next branch of linux-kselftest.git,
modify the patch title and update the commit
On 2/29/24 00:10, David Gow wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 03:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
when running the dev_addr_lists unit test with lock debugging enabled,
I always get the following lockdep warning.
[7.031327]
[7.031393] WARNING:
On 2/28/24 11:51 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:21 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> wrote:
>
> ..
>
>> +static int numer_of_heaps(void)
>> +{
>> + DIR *d = opendir(DEVPATH);
>> + struct dirent *dir;
>> + int heaps = 0;
>> +
>> + while ((dir = readdir(d))) {
Hi Helen,
Thanks for working on this
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:25PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
> This patch introduces a `.gitlab-ci` file along with a `ci/` folder,
> defininga basic test pipeline triggered by code pushes to a GitLab-CI
> instance. This initial version includes static checks
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:13:20 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:38:55 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
>
> > Hmm, this seems arch_rethook_trampoline caused the issue.
> >
> > And curiously, it depends on the number of stored data.
> >
> > OK:
> >
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:07:25AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Chat Discussions
> >
> >
> > For those interested in further discussions:
> >
> > **Join Our Slack Channel:**
> > We have a Slack channel, #gitlab-ci, on the KernelCI Slack instance
> >
On 12/13/2023 4:46 AM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
From: Ackerley Tng
This also exercises the KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES ioctl.
Suggested-by: Isaku Yamahata
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng
Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji
Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar
---
.../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx_util.c | 69
Hi Ido,
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 19:04 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Rename some test cases to avoid overlapping test names which is
> problematic for the kernel test robot. No changes in the test's
> logic.
>
> Suggested-by: Yujie Liu
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel
> ---
> Yujie Liu, please verify
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 03:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> when running the dev_addr_lists unit test with lock debugging enabled,
> I always get the following lockdep warning.
>
> [7.031327]
> [7.031393] WARNING: kunit_try_catch/1886 still has
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 23:40, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On 2/28/24 02:15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > CC testing
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:59 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On 2/27/24 23:25, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >> [ ... ]
>
> This test case is supposed to be as true to the
90 matches
Mail list logo
