Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] bpf/verifier: add bpf_timer as a kfunc capable type

On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 05:38, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 9:01 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > wrote: > > > > On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 04:53, Alexei Starovoitov > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:31 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fr

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] bpf/verifier: add bpf_timer as a kfunc capable type

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 9:01 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 04:53, Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:31 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 15:57, Benjamin Tissoires > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > We n

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] bpf/verifier: add bpf_timer as a kfunc capable type

On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 04:53, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:31 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 15:57, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > > > > > We need to extend the bpf_timer API, but the way forward relies on kfuncs. > > > So make bpf_ti

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] bpf/verifier: add bpf_timer as a kfunc capable type

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:31 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 15:57, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > > > We need to extend the bpf_timer API, but the way forward relies on kfuncs. > > So make bpf_timer known for kfuncs from the verifier PoV > > > > Signed-off-by: Benjami

Re: [BUG] seltests/iommu: runaway ./iommufd consuming 99% CPU after a failed assert()

On 3/19/24 14:58, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:35:40AM +0100, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: Hi, (This is verified on the second test box.) In the most recent 6.8.0 release of torvalds tree kernel with selftest configs on, process ./iommufd appears to consume 99% of a CPU cor