On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 13:12, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 04/09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > The discussion started about running new tests on older kernels. As this
> > is a feature and not a bug fix that obviously fails on older kernels.
>
> OK, I see... please see below.
>
> > So something
On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 at 17:12, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Dmitry, Thomas,
>
> To simplify the review I've attached the code with this patch applied below.
>
> Yes, this changes the "semantics" of check_timer_distribution(), perhaps it
> should be renamed.
>
> But I do not see a better approach, and
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 15:45, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Perhaps I am totally confused, but.
>
> On 04/04, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 17:43, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why distribution_thread() can't simply exit i
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 17:43, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 03 2024 at 17:03, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 04/03, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> The test if fragile as hell as there is absolutely no guarantee that the
> >> signal target distribution is as expected. The expectation is based on
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 at 22:17, John Stultz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 5:30 AM Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > From: Dmitry Vyukov
> >
> > POSIX timers using the CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID clock prefer the main
> > thread of a thread group for si
