On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:12 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> On 8/26/24 00:07, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-08-14 at 20:26 -0700, Fangrui Song wrote:
> >> glibc added support for DT_GNU_HASH in 2006 and DT_HASH has been
> >> obsoleted for more than one deca
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 6:23 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:56 PM Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 10:34 -0700, Fangrui Song wrote:
> > > glibc added support for .gnu.hash in 2006 and .hash has been obsoleted
> > > fo
glibc added support for DT_GNU_HASH in 2006 and DT_HASH has been
obsoleted for more than one decade in many Linux distributions.
Many vDSOs support DT_GNU_HASH. This patch adds selftests support.
Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song
---
tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/parse_vdso.c | 105
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:56 PM Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 10:34 -0700, Fangrui Song wrote:
> > glibc added support for .gnu.hash in 2006 and .hash has been obsoleted
> > for more than one decade in many Linux distributions. Using
> > --hash-style=sysv
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 4:26 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:29 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> wrote:
> >
> > This series fixes build errors found by clang to allow the x86 suite to
> > get built with the clang.
> >
> > Unfortunately, there
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 5:05 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 04:30:27PM -0700, Fangrui Song wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:28 AM Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:28:29PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> > &g
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:28 AM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:28:29PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> > The -static overrides the -pie and binaries aren't position independent
> > anymore. Use -static-pie instead which would produce a static and
> > position independent bin
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:29 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
wrote:
>
> This series fixes build errors found by clang to allow the x86 suite to
> get built with the clang.
>
> Unfortunately, there is one bug [1] in the clang becuase of which
> extended asm isn't handled correctly by it and build fails for
> --
> > Nathan Chancellor
> >
>
> Excellent! Thanks for doing this. I spot checked a handful I was
> familiar with and everything looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook
>
> --
> Kees Cook
>
These reviews.llvm.org links would definitely be kept lik
