Re: [PATCH] kselftest: cpufreq: Add RTC wakeup alarm

2024-07-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 2:10 PM Shreeya Patel wrote: > > Add RTC wakeup alarm for devices to resume after specific time interval. > This improvement in the test will help in enabling this test > in the CI systems and will eliminate the need of manual intervention > for resuming back the devices af

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: amd-pstate: adjust min/max limit perf

2024-02-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:36 PM Mario Limonciello wrote: > > On 2/27/2024 01:39, Meng Li wrote: > > The min/max limit perf values calculated based on frequency > > may exceed the reasonable range of perf(highest perf, lowest perf). > > > > Signed-off-by: Meng Li > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello

Re: [PATCH] Fix the warning of amd-pstate.rst.

2024-02-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 7:04 AM Meng Li wrote: > > Title under line too short > > Signed-off-by: Meng Li > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst > b/Documentation/admi

Re: [PATCH V14 0/7] amd-pstate preferred core

2024-01-31 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:33 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:18:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > You've had comments on the previous version of this. > > > > Have they all been addressed? > > Yeah, see patch 1. Thanks! So th

Re: [PATCH V14 0/7] amd-pstate preferred core

2024-01-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:05 AM Meng Li wrote: > > Hi all: > > The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors. > Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the > infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of > maximum frequ

Re: [PATCH V12 4/7] cpufreq: Add a notification message that the highest perf has changed

2023-12-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 2:40 AM Meng, Li (Jassmine) wrote: > > [AMD Official Use Only - General] > > Hi Rafael: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Meng, Li (Jassmine) > > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 4:27 PM > > To: Rafael J. Wysocki

Re: [PATCH V12 2/7] acpi: cppc: Add get the highest performance cppc control

2023-12-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Please spell ACPI and CPPC in capitals in the subject. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:38 AM Meng Li wrote: > > Add support for getting the highest performance to the > generic CPPC driver. This enables downstream drivers > such as amd-pstate to discover and use these values. > > Please refer to the ACP

Re: [PATCH V12 1/7] x86: Drop CPU_SUP_INTEL from SCHED_MC_PRIO for the expansion.

2023-12-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:38 AM Meng Li wrote: > > amd-pstate driver also uses SCHED_MC_PRIO, so decouple the requirement > of CPU_SUP_INTEL from the dependencies to allow compilation in kernels > without Intel CPU support. > > Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello > Rev

Re: [PATCH V12 4/7] cpufreq: Add a notification message that the highest perf has changed

2023-12-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 10:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:38 AM Meng Li wrote: > > > > > > ACPI 6.5 section 8.4.6.1.1.1 specifies that Notify event 0x85 can be > &

Re: [PATCH V12 4/7] cpufreq: Add a notification message that the highest perf has changed

2023-12-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:38 AM Meng Li wrote: > > > > ACPI 6.5 section 8.4.6.1.1.1 specifies that Notify event 0x85 can be > > emmitted to cause the the OSPM to re-evaluate the highest performance > > Typ

Re: [PATCH V12 4/7] cpufreq: Add a notification message that the highest perf has changed

2023-12-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:38 AM Meng Li wrote: > > ACPI 6.5 section 8.4.6.1.1.1 specifies that Notify event 0x85 can be > emmitted to cause the the OSPM to re-evaluate the highest performance Typos above. Given the number of iterations of this patch, this is kind of disappointing. > register. Ad