On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 01:27:44PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > (I don't need to see all of the tests that passes; it's the test
> > failures or the test flakes that are significant.)
>
> The listing of tests does get a bit more complex when you mix in running
> on different platforms.
Yeah,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:27:33PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> This is the sort of thing that kcidb (which Nikolai works on) is good at
> ingesting, I actually do push all my CI's test results into there
> already:
>
>https://github.com/kernelci/kcidb/
>
> (the dashboard is down currently.)
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 02:30:49PM +0100, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote:
>
> This is not trivial because tests vary a lot and we'd first need to
> define which artifacts to link to, and because whatever is linked (test
> commands, output log, results summary) would need to be stored
> forever. But since
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:39:56PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> IMHO, For XFS, The value of "V" field should refer to xfstests rather than a
> framework built around xfstests. This is because xfstests project contains the
> actual tests and also we could have several frameworks (e.g. Kdevops)
