Re: [PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: improve LLVM/clang support

2024-08-03 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 12:09:54PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > The current support for LLVM and clang in nolibc and its testsuite is > very limited. > > * Various architectures plain do not compile > * The user *has* to specify "-Os" otherwise the program crashes > * Cross-compilation of the

Re: [PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: improve LLVM/clang support

2024-07-29 Thread Shuah Khan
On 7/29/24 13:26, Shuah Khan wrote: On 7/28/24 04:09, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: The current support for LLVM and clang in nolibc and its testsuite is very limited. * Various architectures plain do not compile * The user *has* to specify "-Os" otherwise the program crashes * Cross-compilation of t

Re: [PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: improve LLVM/clang support

2024-07-29 Thread Shuah Khan
On 7/28/24 04:09, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: The current support for LLVM and clang in nolibc and its testsuite is very limited. * Various architectures plain do not compile * The user *has* to specify "-Os" otherwise the program crashes * Cross-compilation of the tests does not work * Using clang

[PATCH 00/12] tools/nolibc: improve LLVM/clang support

2024-07-28 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
The current support for LLVM and clang in nolibc and its testsuite is very limited. * Various architectures plain do not compile * The user *has* to specify "-Os" otherwise the program crashes * Cross-compilation of the tests does not work * Using clang is not wired up in run-tests.sh This series