Hi Ilpo,
On 9/13/2023 4:43 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 9/11/2023 4:19 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>> 5% difference upper bound for success is a bit on the low side for the
>>
>> "a bit on the low side" is very vague.
>
> The commit that introduced th
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> On 9/11/2023 4:19 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > 5% difference upper bound for success is a bit on the low side for the
>
> "a bit on the low side" is very vague.
The commit that introduced that 5% bound plainly admitted it's "randomly
chosen value". A
Hi Ilpo,
On 9/11/2023 4:19 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> 5% difference upper bound for success is a bit on the low side for the
"a bit on the low side" is very vague.
> MBA and MBM tests. Some platforms produce outliers that are slightly
> above that, typically 6-7%.
>
> Relaxing the MBA/MBM succe
5% difference upper bound for success is a bit on the low side for the
MBA and MBM tests. Some platforms produce outliers that are slightly
above that, typically 6-7%.
Relaxing the MBA/MBM success bound to 8% removes most of the failures
due those frequent outliers.
Fixes: 06bd03a57f8c ("selftest