From: Clément Léger <cle...@rivosinc.com>

[ Upstream commit 17c67ed752d6a456602b3dbb25c5ae4d3de5deab ]

Currently, the sud_test expects the emulated syscall to return the
emulated syscall number. This assumption only works on architectures
were the syscall calling convention use the same register for syscall
number/syscall return value. This is not the case for RISC-V and thus
the return value must be also emulated using the provided ucontext.

Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cle...@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206134438.473166-1-cle...@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c     | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c
index b5d592d4099e8..d975a67673299 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c
@@ -158,6 +158,20 @@ static void handle_sigsys(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void 
*ucontext)
 
        /* In preparation for sigreturn. */
        SYSCALL_DISPATCH_OFF(glob_sel);
+
+       /*
+        * The tests for argument handling assume that `syscall(x) == x`. This
+        * is a NOP on x86 because the syscall number is passed in %rax, which
+        * happens to also be the function ABI return register.  Other
+        * architectures may need to swizzle the arguments around.
+        */
+#if defined(__riscv)
+/* REG_A7 is not defined in libc headers */
+# define REG_A7 (REG_A0 + 7)
+
+       ((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.__gregs[REG_A0] =
+                       ((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.__gregs[REG_A7];
+#endif
 }
 
 TEST(dispatch_and_return)
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to