ntel.com; Huang, Ray ; Huang,
> Shimmer ; sk...@linuxfoundation.org;
> viresh.ku...@linaro.org; x...@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 0/7] amd-pstate preferred core
>
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper
> caution when opening attachments, clic
Dear all,
I have found an issue with the patchset when applying on 6.7, leading to a
large degradation in performance.
On my 7840HS on *STOCK* 6.7 highest_perf is reported as 196, not 166 as assumed
in the patchset. Applying the patchset causes highest_perf to be misreported
and hence a misrepo
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:33 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:18:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > You've had comments on the previous version of this.
> >
> > Have they all been addressed?
>
> Yeah, see patch 1.
Thanks!
So the whole lot has been applied as 6.9 mat
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:18:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> You've had comments on the previous version of this.
>
> Have they all been addressed?
Yeah, see patch 1.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:05 AM Meng Li wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
> Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
> infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of
> maximum frequ
Hi all:
The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of
maximum frequency of a part. This means that a fraction of cores can reach
