On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:57:02AM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 03:34:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> > > Add PKEY support to signals, by saving and restoring POR_EL0 from the
> > > stackframe.
> > It'd be nice
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:58:02AM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Actually, now I think about it we at least need an update to the frame
> > parser in userspace so it knows about the new frame. Without that it'll
> > warn whenver it pars
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 03:34:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> > > Add PKEY support to signals, by saving and restoring POR_EL0 from the
> > > stackframe.
>
> > I
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 03:34:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> > Add PKEY support to signals, by saving and restoring POR_EL0 from the
> > stackframe.
>
> It'd be nice to have at least a basic test that validates that we
> gen
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 03:34:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> > Add PKEY support to signals, by saving and restoring POR_EL0 from the
> > stackframe.
> It'd be nice to have at least a basic test that validates that we
> generate a POE
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> Add PKEY support to signals, by saving and restoring POR_EL0 from the
> stackframe.
It'd be nice to have at least a basic test that validates that we
generate a POE signal frame when expected, though that should be a very
minor thing w
Add PKEY support to signals, by saving and restoring POR_EL0 from the
stackframe.
Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly
Cc: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Will Deacon
---
arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 7
arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 51
2 files changed, 58 i
